Access For All Australia

Access for all:
Improv­ing acces­si­bil­i­ty for
con­sumers with dis­abil­i­ty
Intro­duc­tion
This resource pro­vides prac­ti­cal tips for busi­ness­es on improv­ing access to goods, ser­vices, facil­i­ties, premis­es
and infor­ma­tion for con­sumers with dis­abil­i­ty.
Fol­low­ing these tips will not only reduce the like­li­hood of dis­crim­i­na­tion com­plaints against your busi­ness, but will
also increase your access to the mar­ket, and ben­e­fit the com­mu­ni­ty, through greater eco­nom­ic par­tic­i­pa­tion of
peo­ple with dis­abil­i­ty.
Over 4 mil­lion peo­ple in Aus­tralia expe­ri­ence disability.1 That’s around 1 in 5 Aus­tralians. Peo­ple with dis­abil­i­ty, as
well as their friends, rela­tions and col­leagues, con­sti­tute a sig­nif­i­cant group of con­sumers. How­ev­er, busi­ness­es
can often unin­ten­tion­al­ly over­look the needs of these con­sumers, mak­ing it dif­fi­cult for them to access goods and
ser­vices. These busi­ness­es may be miss­ing out on a sig­nif­i­cant cus­tomer base, as well as poten­tial­ly breach­ing
anti-dis­crim­i­na­tion laws.
The Dis­abil­i­ty Dis­crim­i­na­tion Act 1992 (Cth) (DDA) makes it against the law to dis­crim­i­nate against a per­son
because of dis­abil­i­ty when pro­vid­ing goods, ser­vices or facil­i­ties, or access to pub­lic premis­es.
In 2014–15, the Aus­tralian Human Rights Com­mis­sion received 323 com­plaints about dis­abil­i­ty dis­crim­i­na­tion in
the pro­vi­sion of goods, ser­vices and facil­i­ties. A num­ber of these com­plaints also raised issues about access to
premis­es.
There are state and ter­ri­to­ry anti-dis­crim­i­na­tion laws which also pro­hib­it dis­abil­i­ty discrimination.2
These laws
pro­vide for peo­ple to make com­plaints to state and ter­ri­to­ry anti-dis­crim­i­na­tion author­i­ties. The word­ing of each Act
is slight­ly dif­fer­ent, so to work out your oblig­a­tions it is impor­tant that you check the DDA and the leg­is­la­tion in each
state or ter­ri­to­ry in which your busi­ness oper­ates. You can also con­tact the Aus­tralian Human Rights Com­mis­sion
and state and ter­ri­to­ry anti-dis­crim­i­na­tion author­i­ties for infor­ma­tion about what is cov­ered under the law.3
What does the Dis­abil­i­ty Dis­crim­i­na­tion Act say?
The DDA says that dis­abil­i­ty dis­crim­i­na­tion occurs when a per­son is treat­ed less favourably, or not giv­en the
same oppor­tu­ni­ties as oth­ers in a sim­i­lar sit­u­a­tion, because of their dis­abil­i­ty. The dis­abil­i­ty could be tem­po­rary or
per­ma­nent; a phys­i­cal, intel­lec­tu­al, sen­so­ry, neu­ro­log­i­cal, learn­ing or psy­choso­cial dis­abil­i­ty; a dis­ease or ill­ness;
phys­i­cal dis­fig­ure­ment; or med­ical con­di­tion or work-relat­ed injury.
The DDA also pro­tects peo­ple with dis­abil­i­ty who may be dis­crim­i­nat­ed against because they are accom­pa­nied
by an assis­tant, inter­preter or read­er; or a trained ani­mal such as a guide, hear­ing or assis­tance dog; or because
they use equip­ment or an aid, such as a wheel­chair or a hear­ing aid.
Good prac­tice, good busi­ness
humanrights.gov.au/employers
2
Good prac­tice, good busi­ness
humanrights.gov.au/employers
The DDA makes it against the law to dis­crim­i­nate
against a per­son because of their dis­abil­i­ty either:
• by refus­ing to pro­vide them with goods or ser­vices
or make facil­i­ties avail­able; or
• because of the terms or con­di­tions on which, or the
man­ner in which, the goods, ser­vices or facil­i­ties
are provided.4
The DDA also makes it against the law to dis­crim­i­nate
against some­one because of their asso­ci­a­tion with a
per­son with dis­abil­i­ty.
Dis­crim­i­na­tion can be direct, mean­ing a per­son
with dis­abil­i­ty is treat­ed less favourably than a
per­son with­out that dis­abil­i­ty in the same or sim­i­lar
cir­cum­stances. An exam­ple of pos­si­ble direct dis­abil­i­ty
dis­crim­i­na­tion is where a per­son is refused entry to a
restau­rant because they are blind and have a guide
dog.
Dis­crim­i­na­tion can also be indi­rect. Indi­rect dis­abil­i­ty
dis­crim­i­na­tion can hap­pen when con­di­tions or
require­ments are put in place that appear to treat
every­one the same, but actu­al­ly dis­ad­van­tage some
peo­ple because of their dis­abil­i­ty. For exam­ple, it
may be indi­rect dis­crim­i­na­tion if the only way to enter
a shop is by a set of stairs, because peo­ple with
dis­abil­i­ty who use wheel­chairs would be unable to
enter the build­ing. The law says how­ev­er that it will not
be unlaw­ful dis­crim­i­na­tion where the per­son impos­ing
the require­ment or con­di­tion can demon­strate that it is
rea­son­able in the circumstances.5
The DDA requires busi­ness­es to make rea­son­able
adjust­ments to enable a per­son with dis­abil­i­ty to
access goods, ser­vices or facilities.6
How­ev­er, the DDA
says it will not be against the law to dis­crim­i­nate in
pro­vid­ing access to goods, ser­vices or facil­i­ties if it can
be demon­strat­ed that mak­ing the required adjust­ments
would cause ‘unjus­ti­fi­able hardship’.7
Before claim­ing that adjust­ments will cre­ate
unjus­ti­fi­able hard­ship, it is rec­om­mend­ed that
busi­ness­es:
• thor­ough­ly con­sid­er how an adjust­ment might be
made
• esti­mate the cost of mak­ing the adjust­ment
and whether any finan­cial or oth­er assis­tance is
avail­able
• con­sid­er the poten­tial ben­e­fit or detri­ment of the
adjust­ment for:
– any spe­cif­ic per­son con­cerned
– the busi­ness
– the com­mu­ni­ty.
• dis­cuss this direct­ly with any per­son involved
• con­sult rel­e­vant sources of advice.
Mak­ing infor­ma­tion acces­si­ble
One area in which busi­ness­es may unin­ten­tion­al­ly
engage in dis­crim­i­na­tion is in the man­ner and/or
for­mat in which they pro­vide impor­tant infor­ma­tion to
con­sumers, and require infor­ma­tion from con­sumers.
Access for all: Improv­ing acces­si­bil­i­ty for con­sumers with dis­abil­i­ty • 3
Tips for mak­ing infor­ma­tion acces­si­ble
It is impor­tant not to make assump­tions about how
peo­ple can receive or com­mu­ni­cate infor­ma­tion.
The best approach is to make impor­tant infor­ma­tion
avail­able to con­sumers in a vari­ety of for­mats.
To ensure that key infor­ma­tion is acces­si­ble to as
many peo­ple with dis­abil­i­ty as pos­si­ble:
• Make impor­tant infor­ma­tion avail­able to con­sumers
in mul­ti­ple for­mats, not just in hard copy writ­ten
for­mat. Options could include infor­ma­tion being
con­veyed:
– oral­ly by staff (in per­son, or over the phone,
includ­ing, in the case of peo­ple who are Deaf
or have a hear­ing impair­ment, through use of
the Tele­phone Type­writer (TTY) Nation­al Relay
Ser­vice)
– in hard copy writ­ten mate­r­i­al (includ­ing a large
18 font size print option)
– elec­tron­ic for­mats includ­ing by email, via
web­sites and online chat ser­vices
– on com­put­er disc
– as an audio record­ing.
Busi­ness­es could also con­sid­er installing an audio
loop in their pub­lic shopfronts or offices to assist
peo­ple with hear­ing aids, and pro­vid­ing an Aus­lan
inter­preter or Braille option on request.
What is the Nation­al
Relay Ser­vice?
The Nation­al Relay Ser­vice
(NRS) is a phone ser­vice for
peo­ple who are Deaf, have
a hear­ing impair­ment or have
com­plex com­mu­ni­ca­tion needs.
The NRS relay offi­cer pro­vides a link for the
par­ties to the call and relays exact­ly what is
said or typed. The NRS relay offi­cer is present
for the dura­tion of the call to ensure smooth
com­mu­ni­ca­tion between the par­ties but does
not change or inter­fere with what the par­ties say.
If a busi­ness pro­vides infor­ma­tion or ser­vices
to cus­tomers by tele­phone, cus­tomers with
dis­abil­i­ty are enti­tled to use the NRS to access
the business’s tele­phone ser­vice.
For more infor­ma­tion on the NRS, vis­it their
web­site: www.relayservice.com.au
Exam­ples of issues
raised in complaints8
Unable to access bills
A woman who is blind
com­plained that a util­i­ty
com­pa­ny did not pro­vide bills in
an acces­si­ble for­mat. She was seek­ing access
to online billing as a pri­vate and con­ve­nient
method of pay­ment. The com­plaint was
resolved with an agree­ment that the busi­ness
would pro­vide a doc­u­ment in Braille set­ting out
the range of pay­ment options; con­tin­ue a pilot
project to pro­vide sum­ma­ry bills in Braille; and
make elec­tron­ic text for­mat bills avail­able with­in
a spec­i­fied time peri­od.
Unable to access prod­uct assis­tance
A woman with a hear­ing impair­ment com­plained
that when she sought help from an infor­ma­tion
tech­nol­o­gy com­pa­ny in rela­tion to a recent­ly
pur­chased prod­uct, she was told that assis­tance
was only avail­able over the phone. The com­pa­ny
said that the com­plainant had received incor­rect
advice and the com­pa­ny did pro­vide online
prod­uct assis­tance and assis­tance via TTY relay
ser­vices. The com­pa­ny apol­o­gised for what
had hap­pened and offered the com­plainant 12
months free access to a ser­vice upgrade.
Lim­it­ed iden­ti­fi­ca­tion require­ments
A 27-year-old woman with an intel­lec­tu­al
dis­abil­i­ty com­plained that she was refused entry
to a hotel because she could not pro­duce a
dri­ver licence to prove she was over 18 years
of age. The com­plaint was resolved with the
hotel agree­ing to accept a copy of the woman’s
birth cer­tifi­cate as proof of iden­ti­fy and lob­by in
sup­port of a gen­er­al­ly avail­able and accept­able
‘proof of age’ card.
A woman who is blind com­plained that she
had been dis­crim­i­nat­ed against when a cred­it
provider refused to accept her Blind Cit­i­zens
Aus­tralia iden­ti­ty card in place of a dri­ver licence
and required her to obtain legal advice as she
could not read the print­ed con­tract her­self. The
com­plaint was resolved when the respon­dent
agreed to accept the iden­ti­ty card, per­mit
con­tracts to be read to a vision impaired per­son
by an inde­pen­dent per­son rather than just a
lawyer, and inves­ti­gate how con­tracts could be
pro­duced in acces­si­ble for­mats.
4
Good prac­tice, good busi­ness
humanrights.gov.au/employers
• Pro­vide writ­ten infor­ma­tion in clear and con­cise
lan­guage that is easy to under­stand, in a font size
no small­er than 12pt.
• Pro­vide a vari­ety of meth­ods for con­sumers to
con­tact the busi­ness, for exam­ple in per­son, over
the phone (includ­ing by use of a TTY), or by email.
• When a con­sumer is required to pro­duce a form
of iden­ti­fi­ca­tion, for exam­ple when enter­ing into
a con­tract or seek­ing entrance to an age-lim­it­ed
premis­es, accept mul­ti­ple forms of iden­ti­fi­ca­tion.
Do not only rely on a dri­ver licence, as a per­son
with a dis­abil­i­ty may not have one.
• Allow for acces­si­ble pay­ment options e.g. allow for
cred­it card pay­ments to be signed instead of the
per­son hav­ing to enter and remem­ber a PIN.
• Ensure staff are trained about how to pro­vide
infor­ma­tion in a non-dis­crim­i­na­to­ry way, and to
com­mu­ni­cate effec­tive­ly and respect­ful­ly with
peo­ple with dis­abil­i­ty (see more in the last sec­tion
of this resource).
Mak­ing premis­es acces­si­ble
The DDA makes it against the law to dis­crim­i­nate
against peo­ple with dis­abil­i­ty in rela­tion to access
and use of pub­lic premises.10 This applies to places
such as shops, cafes, restau­rants, banks, cin­e­mas,
the­atres and sport­ing venues. Pub­lic ‘premis­es’ can
also include an air­craft or vehi­cle, a place (whether
enclosed or built on or not); and a part of premis­es, for
exam­ple, cus­tomer bathrooms.11
There are nation­al legal­ly-bind­ing stan­dards which
set out tech­ni­cal require­ments for those build­ing or
upgrad­ing premis­es to ensure peo­ple with dis­abil­i­ty
can access and use build­ings, as required by the
DDA.12 The Com­mis­sion has pub­lished a guide­line on
the appli­ca­tion of these stan­dards to assist peo­ple to
imple­ment them.13
In rela­tion to exist­ing premis­es, there are a num­ber of
things that can be done to ensure access for peo­ple
with dis­abil­i­ties. Often inad­e­quate or inap­pro­pri­ate
man­age­ment, main­te­nance and house­keep­ing
prac­tices can make oth­er­wise acces­si­ble premis­es
inac­ces­si­ble – for exam­ple, keep­ing acces­si­ble toi­lets
locked or using them for stor­age.
Find out more
See the Infor­ma­tion
Check­list pub­lished by
the Dis­abil­i­ty Ser­vices
Com­mis­sion of West­ern
Australia.9
Exam­ples of issues
raised in com­plaints
Bar­ri­ers at entrances and
items in aisles
A woman who uses a
wheel­chair com­plained that she
had dif­fi­cul­ty shop­ping in her local super­mar­ket
due to such things as turn­stiles at the entrance
and dis­plays and goods being placed in the
aisles. The com­plaint was resolved when the
super­mar­ket agreed, among oth­er things,
to remove turn­stiles at the entrance con­vey
instruc­tions to staff about keep­ing pas­sages
clear and remod­el dis­plays to ensure aisles are
kept clear.
Acces­si­ble check­out lanes fre­quent­ly being
closed
A man who uses a wheel­chair com­plained
about dif­fi­cul­ties at his local super­mar­ket
includ­ing that the acces­si­ble check­out lanes are
fre­quent­ly closed. The com­plaint was resolved
when the super­mar­ket agreed to ensure that at
least one acces­si­ble lane will always be open.
Locked acces­si­ble toi­lets
A woman who uses a wheel­chair com­plained
that she could not use the acces­si­ble toi­lets in
a shop­ping cen­tre because they were always
locked, while oth­er toi­lets were not. The
com­plaint was resolved when the shop­ping
cen­tre agreed to unlock the acces­si­ble toi­let
facil­i­ties dur­ing open­ing hours and upgrade the
doors to make access eas­i­er and to com­ply with
rel­e­vant Aus­tralian Stan­dards.
Access for all: Improv­ing acces­si­bil­i­ty for con­sumers with dis­abil­i­ty • 5
Tips for main­tain­ing acces­si­ble premis­es
• Do not lock acces­si­ble bath­rooms or lifts while
premis­es are in use by mem­bers of the pub­lic.
Ensure acces­si­ble bath­rooms can be reached via a
con­tin­u­ous acces­si­ble path of trav­el.
• Do not use acces­si­ble bath­rooms or change rooms
as stor­age areas.
• Avoid con­struct­ing tem­po­rary dis­plays or stack­ing
goods in a man­ner which obstructs aisles. Make
sure there are con­tin­u­ous acces­si­ble paths of trav­el
around and with­in premis­es.
• Make sure that counter heights, lift but­tons,
EFTPOS facil­i­ties, door han­dles, etc. are with­in
reach of a per­son using a wheel­chair.
• Ensure that lift but­tons have raised tac­tile and
Braille infor­ma­tion next to them and that the lifts
pro­vide audi­ble infor­ma­tion telling pas­sen­gers what
floor they have arrived at.
• Main­tain ade­quate light­ing lev­els through­out
premis­es.
• Pro­vide ade­quate sig­nage for peo­ple with dis­abil­i­ty
access­ing or using the premis­es.
• Do not allow sur­faces to become dan­ger­ous­ly worn
or slip­pery.
• Pro­vide des­ig­nat­ed park­ing spaces for peo­ple with
dis­abil­i­ties and main­tain a con­tin­u­ous acces­si­ble
path of trav­el from the park­ing space to the
premis­es.
Access to trans­port
The DDA makes it against the law to dis­crim­i­nate
against peo­ple with dis­abil­i­ty in rela­tion to access to
or use of pub­lic air­craft, vehi­cles or vessels.14 This
includes air­lines, taxis, bus­es, trains, trams, rental cars,
fer­ries and cruise ships.
There are legal­ly bind­ing tech­ni­cal require­ments
for pub­lic trans­port providers to ensure access for
peo­ple with dis­abil­i­ty to transport.15 The Com­mis­sion
has pub­lished a guide­line on the require­ments for
acces­si­ble bus stops.16
Many dis­abil­i­ty dis­crim­i­na­tion com­plaints made to the
Com­mis­sion are about peo­ple with dis­abil­i­ties being
denied trav­el in taxis or on air­planes.
Exam­ples of issues
raised in com­plaints
Dif­fi­cul­ty trav­el­ling with an
assis­tance ani­mal
A man who is blind and has
a guide dog com­plained that
when he called to book a taxi and informed
the oper­a­tor that he was trav­el­ling with a guide
dog, he was told not to count on a taxi turn­ing
up. The com­plaint was resolved when the
taxi com­pa­ny agreed, among oth­er things, to
devel­op a dis­abil­i­ty access pro­gram; engage
the local Guide Dog Asso­ci­a­tion to pro­vide
aware­ness train­ing for dri­vers; and pay the
com­plainant $200 com­pen­sa­tion.
Lack of ramps for bus­es
A man who uses a wheel­chair com­plained that
ramps on the acces­si­ble bus­es in his area were
fre­quent­ly out of order for long peri­ods. The
com­plaint was resolved when the bus oper­a­tor
con­firmed that the ramps had been repaired and
arrange­ments made to ensure the work­shop
gave pri­or­i­ty atten­tion to ramp main­te­nance and
repairs in the future.
Restric­tions on inde­pen­dent trav­el
A woman com­plained that when her sis­ter, who
is 50 years old and has an intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty,
arrived to book in for her flight, she was told
that she could not trav­el unac­com­pa­nied.
The com­plainant said her sis­ter has a high
lev­el of capac­i­ty includ­ing hold­ing licences to
oper­ate var­i­ous machines. The com­plaint was
resolved when the air­line apol­o­gised, advised
that it had reviewed is staff infor­ma­tion and
train­ing, com­pen­sat­ed the complainant’s sis­ter
for the embar­rass­ment she expe­ri­enced and
agreed that in future she was able to trav­el
unac­com­pa­nied.
6
Good prac­tice, good busi­ness
humanrights.gov.au/employers
Tips for improv­ing access to trans­port
• Be aware that under the DDA, it is against the law
to refuse a per­son access to trans­port because of
dis­abil­i­ty, unless you can estab­lish:
– if the refusal is because of a require­ment or
con­di­tion which the per­son with dis­abil­i­ty is
unable to com­ply with, that require­ment or
con­di­tion is rea­son­able in the cir­cum­stances, or
– it would cause unjus­ti­fi­able hard­ship for you
to make the adjust­ments nec­es­sary to pro­vide
access.
This includes refus­ing a per­son access to trans­port
because they are accom­pa­nied by an assis­tance
ani­mal. More infor­ma­tion about the DDA and
assis­tance ani­mals is pro­vid­ed in the fol­low­ing
sec­tion.
• Ensure infor­ma­tion rel­e­vant to pas­sen­gers with
dis­abil­i­ty is pro­vid­ed on the trans­port service’s
web­site. Such infor­ma­tion may include spe­cif­ic
book­ing process­es, require­ments for pas­sen­gers
with dis­abil­i­ty, loca­tion of acces­si­ble bus/train
stops, tim­ing of acces­si­ble ser­vices, access
fea­tures, etc.
• Make sure book­ing forms and mobile apps are
acces­si­ble to peo­ple with dis­abil­i­ty.
• Pro­vide train­ing to front­line staff on the deliv­ery of
acces­si­ble trans­port to pas­sen­gers with dis­abil­i­ty.
• Take steps to inform book­ing agents (e.g. trav­el
agents) of rel­e­vant con­sid­er­a­tions for pas­sen­gers
with dis­abil­i­ty (e.g. need to demon­strate fit­ness to
trav­el, dis­abil­i­ty equip­ment car­riage restric­tions,
access fea­tures, etc.)
Access to premis­es and ser­vices
for peo­ple who use assis­tance
ani­mals
The DDA makes it against the law to dis­crim­i­nate
against a per­son with dis­abil­i­ty who is accom­pa­nied
by an ani­mal that is trained to alle­vi­ate the effects
of their disability.17 In 2014–15 com­plaints to the
Com­mis­sion about dis­crim­i­na­tion because the per­son
had an assis­tance ani­mal increased by 44%.18
The most com­mon and well-known exam­ple of
assis­tance ani­mals are guide dogs who assist peo­ple
who are blind or have a vision impair­ment. How­ev­er,
the cat­e­go­ry of assis­tance ani­mals recog­nised by the
DDA is much broad­er than just guide dogs.
Assis­tance ani­mals can also be trained to assist
peo­ple who are Deaf or have a hear­ing impair­ment,
peo­ple who require phys­i­cal sup­port for mobil­i­ty,
peo­ple with psy­choso­cial dis­abil­i­ty and peo­ple who
have med­ical con­di­tions such as epilep­sy.
If you are not sure whether an ani­mal is an assis­tance
ani­mal it is not against the law to ask a per­son
with dis­abil­i­ty to pro­vide evi­dence that an ani­mal
is an assis­tance ani­mal or that it is trained to meet
stan­dards of hygiene and behav­iour appro­pri­ate for
an ani­mal in a pub­lic place.19 Evi­dence can include
iden­ti­fi­ca­tion from a state or ter­ri­to­ry assis­tance ani­mal
reg­is­ter, a card from a reg­is­tered train­ing organ­i­sa­tion
or a med­ical cer­tifi­cate.
The DDA also says it is not unlaw­ful to request or
require that an assis­tance ani­mal remain under the
con­trol of the per­son. An ani­mal does not need to be
on a har­ness or leash to be under a person’s control.20
For exam­ple, a per­son with dis­abil­i­ty may con­trol
an assis­tance ani­mal through eye con­tact, voice
com­mands, touch or close phys­i­cal prox­im­i­ty.
It may also not be unlaw­ful to dis­crim­i­nate against a
per­son with dis­abil­i­ty accom­pa­nied by an assis­tance
ani­mal if you rea­son­ably sus­pect the ani­mal has an
infec­tious dis­ease and the dis­crim­i­na­tion is rea­son­ably
nec­es­sary to pro­tect pub­lic health or the health of
oth­er animals.21
Access for all: Improv­ing acces­si­bil­i­ty for con­sumers with dis­abil­i­ty • 7
Tips for improv­ing acces­si­bil­i­ty for peo­ple
with assis­tance ani­mals
• Be aware that under the DDA, it is against the law
to refuse a per­son access to premis­es, facil­i­ties,
goods or ser­vices sim­ply because they are
accom­pa­nied by an assis­tance ani­mal, unless you
can estab­lish:
– if the refusal is because of a require­ment
or con­di­tion which the per­son with the
assis­tance ani­mal is unable to com­ply with, that
require­ment or con­di­tion is rea­son­able in the
cir­cum­stances, or
– it would cause unjus­ti­fi­able hard­ship for you to
make the adjust­ments nec­es­sary to pro­vide the
per­son access with their assis­tance ani­mal.
• Be aware that a guide dog is only one form of
assis­tance ani­mal and there are oth­er assis­tance
ani­mals such as those that assist peo­ple with
hear­ing dis­abil­i­ties and med­ical con­di­tions.
• If you are unsure if an ani­mal is an assis­tance
ani­mal, the law says that it is OK to ask the per­son
with the dis­abil­i­ty to pro­vide some evi­dence that
the ani­mal is an assis­tance ani­mal and has been
trained to meet stan­dards of hygiene and behav­iour
appro­pri­ate for an ani­mal in a pub­lic place.
• If you are unsure whether an ani­mal is an
assis­tance ani­mal, ask the per­son before ask­ing
them to leave the premis­es or leave their ani­mal
out­side.
• Pro­vide front­line staff with infor­ma­tion and/or
train­ing about assis­tance ani­mals.
• Find out if your state or ter­ri­to­ry has a reg­is­ter for
assis­tance ani­mals. This may help you or your
staff clar­i­fy if an ani­mal is an assis­tance ani­mal.
How­ev­er, be aware that not all assis­tance ani­mals
may be reg­is­tered (e.g. ani­mals still in train­ing or
from oth­er states or ter­ri­to­ries).
Exam­ples of issues raised in com­plaints
Unable to access a restau­rant
A man who is blind and uses a guide dog com­plained that when he and his fam­i­ly went
to a restau­rant to order take-away food he was asked to leave because of his dog. The
restau­rant man­ag­er said he was not aware that guide dogs were allowed in restau­rants.
He apol­o­gised for what hap­pened, agreed to arrange train­ing about guide dog access for
his staff and place a “Guide Dog Wel­come” stick­er at the front of the restau­rant.
Refused access to a sports club
The com­plainant has a dis­abil­i­ty that affects her mobil­i­ty and bal­ance and uses an assis­tance dog to
alle­vi­ate the effects of her dis­abil­i­ty. She was a reg­u­lar spec­ta­tor at a local sports club and claimed
the man­ag­er refused her access to the club because of her assis­tance ani­mal. The club said that the
complainant’s assis­tance ani­mal did not meet that state’s leg­isla­tive require­ments for accred­i­ta­tion and
explained it was unaware that under the DDA an ‘assis­tance ani­mal’ includes an ani­mal that is trained but
not nec­es­sar­i­ly accred­it­ed under state law. The com­plaint was resolved when the club agreed to review its
poli­cies regard­ing assis­tance ani­mals to ensure com­pli­ance with fed­er­al dis­abil­i­ty dis­crim­i­na­tion law. The
man­ag­er also expressed regret for any mis­un­der­stand­ing that had occurred.
Refused access to an air­craft
In the recent case of Mul­li­gan v Vir­gin Aus­tralia Airlines22 the Fed­er­al Court of Aus­tralia found that Vir­gin
Aus­tralia had breached the DDA when it refused to allow Mr Mul­li­gan, a man with cere­bral pal­sy, vision
impair­ment and mobil­i­ty impair­ment, to be accom­pa­nied by his dog in the cab­in dur­ing a domes­tic flight.
Mr Mulligan’s dog had been trained by a dog train­ing school to assist Mr Mul­li­gan with his dis­abil­i­ty.
The Court ordered Vir­gin to pay Mr Mul­li­gan $10,000 in com­pen­sa­tion.
The Court said that it is not nec­es­sary for an assis­tant ani­mal to be trained by an accred­it­ed organ­i­sa­tion,
as long as it has been trained by a per­son or organ­i­sa­tion to assist a per­son with dis­abil­i­ty to alle­vi­ate the
effect of the dis­abil­i­ty, and to meet stan­dards of hygiene and behav­iour that are appro­pri­ate for an ani­mal
in a pub­lic place.
8
Good prac­tice, good busi­ness
humanrights.gov.au/employers
Access for peo­ple using mobil­i­ty
devices
As well as pro­tect­ing the rights of peo­ple who
have assis­tance ani­mals, the DDA also pro­hibits
dis­crim­i­na­tion against peo­ple who use a ‘dis­abil­i­ty
aid’.23 A dis­abil­i­ty aid is defined as any equip­ment
that is used by a per­son with dis­abil­i­ty which assists
to lessen the effect of the disability.24 Exam­ples
of dis­abil­i­ty aids include mobil­i­ty devices such as
wheel­chairs and mobil­i­ty scooters.25
Under the DDA, it may be against the law for the own­er
or man­ag­er of a shop, restau­rant, club, or oth­er venue
to refuse entry to some­one who uses a scoot­er if it is
being used as a dis­abil­i­ty aid. It may also be against
the law to restrict the access of the per­son only to
cer­tain parts of the premis­es.
Busi­ness­es should con­sid­er the needs of con­sumers
who use scoot­ers as a mobil­i­ty aid.
The gen­er­al tips for main­tain­ing acces­si­ble premis­es,
men­tioned in the ear­li­er sec­tion of this resource, also
apply to peo­ple who use mobil­i­ty devices.
Access online
Avail­able data indi­cates that the major­i­ty of peo­ple with
dis­abil­i­ty who are 15 years or old­er use online ser­vices
to do things such as pur­chase goods, pay bills and
con­duct banking.27 There are dif­fer­ent tech­nolo­gies
which can assist peo­ple with dis­abil­i­ty to access and
use online resources. For exam­ple, peo­ple with vision
impair­ments can use screen-read­er soft­ware which
reads out what is on the com­put­er screen.
Mak­ing infor­ma­tion avail­able online in addi­tion to
pro­vid­ing it in hard copy, over the phone, or in per­son
can be an impor­tant way of mak­ing sure that peo­ple
with dis­abil­i­ty can access that infor­ma­tion. Sim­i­lar­ly,
mak­ing goods and ser­vices avail­able via acces­si­ble
web­sites or mobile apps can enable usage by peo­ple
with dis­abil­i­ty who would oth­er­wise not be able to
access them.
The require­ment in the DDA that providers of goods
and ser­vices not dis­crim­i­nate against a per­son
because of dis­abil­i­ty applies to online ser­vices as
it does in the phys­i­cal world. Online providers of
infor­ma­tion, goods and/or ser­vices need to con­sid­er
the acces­si­bil­i­ty of their web­sites and mobile device
appli­ca­tions for peo­ple with disability.28
Detailed guid­ance on how to design acces­si­ble
web­sites is con­tained in the Web Con­tent Acces­si­bil­i­ty
Guide­lines (Web Guide­lines) devel­oped by the World
Wide Web Consortium.29 The Com­mis­sion has
devel­oped an Advi­so­ry Note on acces­si­bil­i­ty of web
resources to clar­i­fy the require­ments of the DDA in this
area, and explain how com­pli­ance with them can be
best achieved, with ref­er­ence to the Web Guidelines.30
The World Wide Web Con­sor­tium has also devel­oped
a doc­u­ment explain­ing how the Web Guide­lines can be
applied to mobile web con­tent and mobile web apps.31
Find out more
For more infor­ma­tion about
how to ensure premis­es
are acces­si­ble for peo­ple
with dis­abil­i­ty using mobil­i­ty
scoot­ers, see the Commission’s
Advi­so­ry Note on Mobil­i­ty Scoot­ers
in Reg­is­tered Clubs.
26
Access for all: Improv­ing acces­si­bil­i­ty for con­sumers with dis­abil­i­ty • 9
Tips for increas­ing acces­si­bil­i­ty of online
con­tent
• Be aware that mate­r­i­al that is pre­sent­ed only in an
image-based for­mat such as GIF or TIF will not be
acces­si­ble to some peo­ple with dis­abil­i­ty.
• Use plain fonts that are easy to read. Avoid fonts
that are dec­o­ra­tive or stylised.
• Make sure there is enough con­trast between
fore­ground text and back­ground colours so that the
text is easy to read.
• Do not pro­vide con­tent only in pdf for­mat, as
screen-read­ers gen­er­al­ly can­not read these
prop­er­ly. If you include pdfs, pro­vide the same
infor­ma­tion in Word and/or html for­mat.
• Make sure you include text descrip­tions for all non­text con­tent, includ­ing all images and graphs, for
exam­ple, using the Alt text func­tion.
• Avoid scanned pic­tures of text e.g. a pho­to of a
menu and text box­es, as screen-read­ers can’t read
these.
• Pro­vide cap­tions and/or tran­script for mul­ti­me­dia
(i.e. audio and video) con­tent.
• Do not set audio or video con­tent to play
auto­mat­i­cal­ly when a page is loaded, as this can
inter­fere with the use of screen-read­ers.
• Rather than using a ‘CAPTCHA’ to pro­tect against
mali­cious machine inter­fer­ence with your web­site
(for exam­ple wavy let­ters in an image file which a
user must iden­ti­fy and retype), use an acces­si­ble
alter­na­tive such as requir­ing the user to reply to an
email sent to their email address.
• Make sure that all the con­tent on your web­site can
be nav­i­gat­ed by keys on the key­board (i.e. it does
not require use of a mouse).
• Make tech­ni­cal sup­port avail­able for con­sumers
who need assis­tance using your web­site, via online
chat ses­sion, phone or email.
• Test the acces­si­bil­i­ty of your web­site, and where
nec­es­sary speak to an acces­si­bil­i­ty pro­fes­sion­al.
Exam­ples of issues raised in com­plaints
Prob­lems with online bank­ing
A woman who has a vision impair­ment com­plained that she could not access her cred­it
union’s online bank­ing ser­vice because the secu­ri­ty fea­tures that had been installed to
ver­i­fy iden­ti­fy were not acces­si­ble to her. The com­plaint was resolved when the cred­it
union agreed to upgrade its site to pro­vide an acces­si­ble method for ver­i­fy­ing a person’s
iden­ti­ty.
Prob­lems with online shop­ping
A woman with a vision impair­ment com­plained that her super­mar­ket had upgrad­ed its web­site and in
doing so had made it dif­fi­cult for her to arrange a time for deliv­ery. The com­plaint was resolved with an
agree­ment that the com­pa­ny would make fur­ther improve­ments to enhance the acces­si­bil­i­ty of its online
shop­ping ser­vice.
Find out more
For more infor­ma­tion,
resources and assis­tance in
rela­tion to web acces­si­bil­i­ty,
see:
• Media Access Aus­tralia
www.mediaaccess.org.au/web
• Access IQ
www.accessiq.org
• Vision Aus­tralia
www.visionaustralia.org/business-andprofessionals/digital-access-consulting
10
Good prac­tice, good busi­ness
humanrights.gov.au/employers
Plan­ning acces­si­ble events
Those who plan events, includ­ing meet­ings, fes­ti­vals,
con­fer­ences, lec­tures, and fundrais­ers, need to
take all rea­son­able steps to ensure that the event is
acces­si­ble so that peo­ple with dis­abil­i­ty can attend
and par­tic­i­pate. Con­sid­er­a­tion should be giv­en to the
issues raised in each of the ear­li­er sec­tions of this
resource, includ­ing:
• whether infor­ma­tion about the event is pro­vid­ed in
(mul­ti­ple) acces­si­ble for­mats when pro­mot­ing and
invit­ing peo­ple to the event
• whether any web­site used for pro­mo­tion or
tick­et­ing for the event is acces­si­ble
• whether the cho­sen venue, and the set up with­in
the venue, is acces­si­ble for peo­ple with dis­abil­i­ty,
includ­ing for peo­ple using mobil­i­ty devices or
assis­tance ani­mals.
Tips for mak­ing events acces­si­ble
Below are some sim­ple tips to increase the
acces­si­bil­i­ty of your event:32
• Explain the acces­si­bil­i­ty of the venue on the
invi­ta­tion or reg­is­tra­tion form and request atten­dees
to inform you of any acces­si­bil­i­ty require­ments they
have. For exam­ple:
Access for peo­ple with dis­abil­i­ty
The venue is acces­si­ble for peo­ple using
wheel­chairs. All hand­out mate­ri­als will be avail­able
in acces­si­ble elec­tron­ic for­mat on request. If you
have any oth­er acces­si­bil­i­ty require­ments in order
to par­tic­i­pate ful­ly, please let us know, and the
event organ­is­er will con­tact you.
• Make sure there is suf­fi­cient clear, sim­ple and
vis­i­ble sig­nage to direct peo­ple where to go.
• Ensure the venue is large enough and set out in
such a way that peo­ple with dis­abil­i­ty, includ­ing
peo­ple using mobil­i­ty devices such as wheel­chairs
or scoot­ers, can move freely around even when the
venue is full.
• When set­ting up seat­ing arrange­ments and
allo­ca­tions, allow peo­ple with dis­abil­i­ty a choice
of seat­ing, includ­ing options with a clear view of
the stage/speakers plat­form. This is par­tic­u­lar­ly
impor­tant for peo­ple who are Deaf or have a
hear­ing impair­ment.
• Ensure that any speak­ers are aware that if they
are using pow­er­point slides or videos in their
pre­sen­ta­tions, they need to pro­vide the same
infor­ma­tion in a for­mat which is acces­si­ble for
peo­ple who have vision or hear­ing impair­ments.
For exam­ple, speak­ers could pro­vide an oral
descrip­tion of pow­er­point slides, pro­vide hard
copy, elec­tron­ic and/or audio copies of the mate­r­i­al
ahead of the event, and/or use cap­tion­ing or Aus­lan
inter­preters dur­ing the pre­sen­ta­tion.
• Brief venue and reg­is­tra­tion staff about their
respon­si­bil­i­ty to avoid dis­crim­i­nat­ing against
peo­ple with dis­abil­i­ty, and about any access issues,
such as allow­ing peo­ple using assis­tance ani­mals
into the venue, loca­tion of acces­si­ble toi­lets and
avail­abil­i­ty of hand­outs in acces­si­ble for­mats. This
infor­ma­tion could be pro­vid­ed to staff before the
event in writ­ing, or in a brief­ing ses­sion.
• Give a spec­i­fied staff mem­ber respon­si­bil­i­ty for
address­ing any acces­si­bil­i­ty issues that arise on the
day of the event, and make sure that all staff work­ing
at the event are aware of who that per­son is.
Exam­ples of issues raised in com­plaints
Lack of audio loop
A man who has a hear­ing impair­ment said he attend­ed a lec­ture series at a pub­lic
venue but was unable to hear the con­tent as the the­atre did not have an audio loop.
The com­plaint was resolved on the basis of an agree­ment to pro­vide the man with an
apol­o­gy, refund the fee he had paid and install an audio hear­ing loop in the the­atre.
Lack of lift access
A man who uses a wheel­chair com­plained that a pub­licly fund­ed arts facil­i­ty did not have pub­lic lift access.
This meant that patrons who could not use stairs had to use the goods lift and be accom­pa­nied by staff
through oth­er­wise ‘off lim­it’ areas of the build­ing. The com­plaint was resolved with an agree­ment that the
arts cen­tre would install an appro­pri­ate pub­lic lift.
Access for all: Improv­ing acces­si­bil­i­ty for con­sumers with dis­abil­i­ty • 11
Com­mu­ni­cat­ing effec­tive­ly with
peo­ple with dis­abil­i­ty
The key to resolv­ing any acces­si­bil­i­ty issues is
respect­ful and effec­tive com­mu­ni­ca­tion with
con­sumers with dis­abil­i­ty, and the pro­vi­sion of
prac­ti­cal assis­tance in response to their requests.
Train­ing your staff on how to com­mu­ni­cate with peo­ple
with dis­abil­i­ty is an impor­tant step in ensur­ing you are
pro­vid­ing an acces­si­ble ser­vice.
The fol­low­ing are some key tips for com­mu­ni­cat­ing
with peo­ple with disability:33
• Talk direct­ly to the per­son with dis­abil­i­ty, not the
oth­er peo­ple who may be with them (such as a sign
lan­guage inter­preter).
• Ask the per­son first if they want assis­tance, and
if they answer yes, ask how you can best assist
them. Do not assume they need assis­tance, or that
you know what they require.
• If a per­son is Deaf or has a hear­ing impair­ment:
– make sure you face the per­son when you speak
– move out of areas with lots of back­ground noise
– have a pen and paper to help you com­mu­ni­cate,
if nec­es­sary.
• If a per­son has a vision impair­ment or is blind:
– iden­ti­fy your­self by name to them
– if appro­pri­ate, ask for their name so you can
address them direct­ly and they know you are
talk­ing to them
– if the per­son asks for assis­tance to go
some­where, ask which side they would pre­fer
that you stand and offer your arm so they can
hold onto it.
• Do not pat, talk to, or oth­er­wise dis­tract a guide
dog or oth­er assis­tance ani­mal.
• Use appro­pri­ate lan­guage – For exam­ple use the
term ‘per­son with dis­abil­i­ty’ rather than ‘dis­abled
per­son’. When describ­ing facil­i­ties for peo­ple
with dis­abil­i­ty, use the word ‘acces­si­ble’ (e.g.
‘acces­si­ble toi­let’, ‘acces­si­ble park­ing’, ‘acces­si­ble
entry’).
12
Good prac­tice, good busi­ness
humanrights.gov.au/employers
1 Aus­tralian Bureau of Sta­tis­tics, Dis­abil­i­ty, Age­ing and
Car­ers, Aus­tralia: Sum­ma­ry of Find­ings, 2012 ABS cat no
4430.0 (2013). At www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Look
up/3A5561E876CDAC73CA257C210011AB9B?opendocu
ment (viewed 16 Decem­ber 2015).
2 See Dis­crim­i­na­tion Act 1991 (ACT); Anti-Dis­crim­i­na­tion
Act 1977 (NSW); Anti-Dis­crim­i­na­tion Act 1996 (NT); AntiDis­crim­i­na­tion Act 1991 (Qld); Equal Oppor­tu­ni­ty Act 1984
(SA); Anti-Dis­crim­i­na­tion Act 1998 (Tas); Equal Oppor­tu­ni­ty
Act 2010 (Vic); Equal Oppor­tu­ni­ty Act 1984 (WA).
3 See the Aus­tralian Human Rights Commission’s Nation­al
Infor­ma­tion Ser­vice at: www.humanrights.gov.au/
com­plaint-infor­ma­tion
4 Dis­abil­i­ty Dis­crim­i­na­tion Act 1992 (Cth) s 24.
5 Dis­abil­i­ty Dis­crim­i­na­tion Act 1992 (Cth), s 6.
6 Dis­abil­i­ty Dis­crim­i­na­tion Act 1992 (Cth) sub-ss 5(2) and 6(2).
7 Dis­abil­i­ty Dis­crim­i­na­tion Act 1992 (Cth) ss 4 (see def­i­n­i­tion
of ‘rea­son­able adjust­ment’); 5(2), 6(2) and 11.
8 Com­plaints brought to the Com­mis­sion are resolved
on the basis of ‘no admis­sion of legal lia­bil­i­ty’. It should
also be not­ed that a respon­dent to a com­plaint may not
nec­es­sar­i­ly agree with the fac­tu­al sit­u­a­tion as set out by
the com­plainant, but will agree to par­tic­i­pate in con­cil­i­a­tion
to try to resolve the com­plaint.
9 Dis­abil­i­ty Ser­vices Com­mis­sion West­ern Aus­tralia, Access
and Inclu­sion Resource Kit: Infor­ma­tion Check­list (2014).
Avail­able at www.disability.wa.gov.au/business-andgovernment1/business-and-government/disability-accessand-inclusion-plans/implementing-your-daip/access-andinclusion-resource-kit/ (viewed on 23 Feb­ru­ary 2016).
10 Dis­abil­i­ty Dis­crim­i­na­tion Act 1992 (Cth) s 23.
11 Dis­abil­i­ty Dis­crim­i­na­tion Act 1992 (Cth), s 4.
12 See Dis­abil­i­ty (Access to Premis­es – Build­ings) Stan­dards
2010 (Cth). The Premis­es Stan­dards cov­er mat­ters such
as the design and con­struc­tion of ramps and stair­ways,
acces­si­ble toi­lets, and hear­ing aug­men­ta­tion sys­tems.
The cur­rent Premis­es Stan­dards are avail­able at www.
comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2011C00214, but note that these
Stan­dards are cur­rent­ly under review, so may be revised
after the date of this pub­li­ca­tion.
13 See Aus­tralian Human Rights Com­mis­sion, Guide­line
on the appli­ca­tion of the Premis­es Stan­dards (Ver­sion 2)
(2013). Avail­able at www.humanrights.gov.au/guidelinesapplication-premises-standards (viewed 23 Feb­ru­ary 2016).
14 Dis­abil­i­ty Dis­crim­i­na­tion Act 1992 (Cth) s 23 (and see
def­i­n­i­tion of premis­es in s 4).
15 See the Dis­abil­i­ty Stan­dards for Acces­si­ble Pub­lic
Trans­port 2002 (Cth). Avail­able at www.comlaw.gov.au/
Details/F2011C00213 (viewed 23 Feb­ru­ary 2016).
16 Aus­tralian Human Rights Com­mis­sion, Guide­line for
pro­mot­ing com­pli­ance of bus stops with the Dis­abil­i­ty
Stan­dards for Acces­si­ble Pub­lic Trans­port 2002 (2010).
At www.humanrights.gov.au/australian-human-rightscommission-accessible-bus-stops-guidelines (viewed
23 Feb­ru­ary 2016).
17 Dis­abil­i­ty Dis­crim­i­na­tion Act 1992 (Cth), s 8.
18 See Aus­tralian Human Rights Com­mis­sion, Assis­tance
Ani­mals and the Dis­abil­i­ty Dis­crim­i­na­tion Act 1992 (Cth)
(18 Jan­u­ary 2016) Aus­tralian Human Rights Com­mis­sion.
At www.humanrights.gov.au/our-work/disability-rights/
pro­ject­s/as­sis­tance-ani­mals-and-dis­abil­i­ty-dis­crim­i­na­tion­act-1992-cth (viewed 16 March 2016).
19 Dis­abil­i­ty Dis­crim­i­na­tion Act 1992 (Cth) sub‑s 54A(5) and (6).
20 Dis­abil­i­ty Dis­crim­i­na­tion Act 1992 (Cth) sub‑s 54A(2) and (3).
21 Dis­abil­i­ty Dis­crim­i­na­tion Act 1992 (Cth) sub‑s 54A(4).
22 [2015] FCAFC 130.
23 See Dis­abil­i­ty Dis­crim­i­na­tion Act 1992 (Cth), s 8.
24 Dis­abil­i­ty Dis­crim­i­na­tion Act 1992 (Cth), sub‑s 9(3).
25 Scoot­ers are increas­ing­ly being used by peo­ple of all ages
as a mobil­i­ty aid: see Aus­tralian Com­pe­ti­tion & Con­sumer
Com­mis­sion, Mobil­i­ty scoot­er usage and safe­ty sur­vey
report (2012). At www.productsafety.gov.au/content/index.
phtml/itemId/996221 (viewed 23 Decem­ber 2015).
26 Aus­tralian Human Rights Com­mis­sion, Advi­so­ry Note on
Mobil­i­ty Scoot­ers in Reg­is­tered Clubs (2014). At www.
humanrights.gov.au/our-work/disability-rights/projects/
mobil­i­ty-scoot­ers-reg­is­tered-clubs (viewed 23 Feb­ru­ary
2016).
27 Aus­tralian Bureau of Sta­tis­tics, Dis­abil­i­ty, Age­ing and
Car­ers, Aus­tralia: Sum­ma­ry of Find­ings, 2012 ABS cat no
4430.0 (2013), Table 22 Per­sons Aged 15 Years or Over,
Liv­ing in House­holds, Com­put­er and inter­net access and
use, by age and dis­abil­i­ty sta­tus – 2012. At www.abs.gov.
au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/4430.02012?OpenDo
cument (viewed 4 Jan­u­ary 2016).
28 In terms of what is a rea­son­able lev­el of acces­si­bil­i­ty under
the DDA, see the dis­cus­sion of ‘unjus­ti­fi­able hard­ship’
in the ear­li­er sec­tion of this resource ‘What does the
Dis­abil­i­ty Dis­crim­i­na­tion Act say?’
29 The Web Guide­lines and relat­ed resources are avail­able at
www.w3.org/WAI/intro/wcag.php (viewed 4 Jan­u­ary 2016).
The Web Guide­lines rep­re­sent the most com­pre­hen­sive
and author­i­ta­tive inter­na­tion­al bench­mark for best prac­tice
in the design of acces­si­ble web­sites. The Com­mis­sion
rec­om­mends that busi­ness­es aim for an ‘AA’ lev­el of
com­pli­ance with the Web Guide­lines: see ‘How to Meet
WCAG 2.0: A cus­tomiz­able quick ref­er­ence to Web
Con­tent Acces­si­bil­i­ty Guide­lines 2.0 require­ments (suc­cess
cri­te­ria) and tech­niques’, at www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/
quickref/ (viewed 27 Jan­u­ary 2016).
30 Aus­tralian Human Rights Com­mis­sion, World Wide Web
Access: Dis­abil­i­ty Dis­crim­i­na­tion Act Advi­so­ry Notes ver
4.0 (2014). At www.humanrights.gov.au/world-wide-webaccess-disability-discrimination-act-advisory-notesver-40–2010 (viewed 23 Feb­ru­ary 2016).
31 W3C, Mobile Acces­si­bil­i­ty: How WCAG 2.0 and Oth­er
W3C/WAI Guide­lines Apply to Mobile (2015). At www.
w3.org/TR/mobile-accessibility-mapping/ (viewed
23 Feb­ru­ary 2016).
32 These tips are based on the Acces­si­ble Events Guide
devel­oped by the Meet­ings and Events Indus­try of
Aus­tralia in part­ner­ship with the Com­mis­sion: see
Meet­ings and Events Aus­tralia, Acces­si­ble Events: A guide
for Meet­ing and Event Organ­is­ers (2012). At http://sydney.
edu.au/current_students/disability/documents/Accessible_
Events_Guide.pdf (viewed 16 March 2016).
33 These tips are drawn from the Acces­si­ble Events
Guide devel­oped by the Meet­ings and Events Indus­try
of Aus­tralia in part­ner­ship with the Com­mis­sion: see
Meet­ings and Events Aus­tralia, Acces­si­ble Events: A guide
for Meet­ing and Event Organ­is­ers (2012). At http://sydney.
edu.au/current_students/disability/documents/Accessible_
Events_Guide.pdf (viewed 16 March 2016).
Access for all: Improv­ing acces­si­bil­i­ty for con­sumers with dis­abil­i­ty • 13
Fur­ther infor­ma­tion
Aus­tralian Human Rights
Com­mis­sion
Lev­el 3, 175 Pitt Street
SYDNEY NSW 2000
GPO Box 5218
SYDNEY NSW 2001
Tele­phone: (02) 9284 9600
Nation­al Infor­ma­tion Ser­vice: 1300 656 419
TTY: 1800 620 241
Email: infoservice@humanrights.gov.au
Web­site: www.humanrights.gov.au/employers
These doc­u­ments pro­vide gen­er­al infor­ma­tion only on the sub­ject mat­ter cov­ered. It is not intend­ed, nor should it be relied on,
as a sub­sti­tute for legal or oth­er pro­fes­sion­al advice. If required, it is rec­om­mend­ed that the read­er obtain inde­pen­dent legal
advice. The infor­ma­tion con­tained in these doc­u­ments may be amend­ed from time to time.
Revised June 2016.
Good prac­tice, good busi­ness
humanrights.gov.au/employers

Author: mayet

Mirror Mirror on the wall, Who is the Faerest of us all? The Truth are we in the skies you see, The Balance of Fire And Water is Elektricity.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *