Lumiel Data 1

Does any­one have any knowl­edge on Lumiel??? This is how much i’ve found out so far: In the Kab­bal­ah, Lumiel is some­times con­sid­ered to be the angel of the earth. He is some­times con­sid­ered to be both a plan­e­tary angel and an Archangel. How­ev­er, San­dalphon and Uriel are more usu­al­ly asso­ci­at­ed with the ele­ment of earth. Lumiel has always been con­tro­ver­sial, and many peo­ple con­sid­er him a “dark angel.”

ar 21, 2011#2

Some­one on here must know Lumiels Sig­il??
“Nil nisi clavis deest.
Si talia jun­gere pos­sis sit tibi scire satis”
Quote
Share

Ariel of Megadriel

6587

Aeon

 

r 22, 2011#3

Lumiel (Lama, Lu Ma, Lamas, Lamas­su, Lamiel, Lumael, Luma’il) is a vari­ant of “Lama’el” or “Luma’el”.
His name rough­ly trans­lates into “The reason/hidden of God” or “the God of why’s”. He is an Archangel, but also a Cheru­bim and of a sub­or­der of angels who act as inter­ces­sors & prayer receivers. In this role he was par­tic­u­lar­ly unique to the Chaldeans, who believed him (based on his name­sake “Imla­ma” — who was a guardian of the secret of the very rich con­cept that God does not reveal the “rea­sons” for the events of life/death but keeps them hid­den. In the ancient world, prayers that involved the idea of “why” (such as “why is this happening?”/“why can’t I…?”) were giv­en a sort of sta­tus above prayers of peti­tions or wor­ship. They were con­sid­ered pow­er­ful, but also dan­ger­ous, because they were nev­er answered direct­ly & could yield unpre­dictable con­se­quences. They were usu­al­ly avoid­ed & some­times taught as blas­phe­my, but usu­al­ly used in des­per­ate sit­u­a­tions, & evoked as curs­es. Lama’el was first con­sid­ered a ‘dark’ angel based on his asso­ci­a­tion with this con­cept. He received prayers such as these & dis­pensed bless­ings or curs­es based on the nature of the prayer.In this role he is also a Cherub, and to the Chaldeans he was asso­ci­at­ed with Nir­gal & one of the 4 prin­ci­pal spir­its of pro­tec­tion. He was invoked at the end of rit­u­als and invo­ca­tions to ‘clear’ unwant­ed spir­its remain­ing & to exor­cise hid­den demons. He was rep­re­sent­ed (as most Cheru­bim are) as a sphinx or chimeric, with the body of a lion & the head of a man.

As an Archangel he is sim­ply called an Archangel of the Earth, and is usu­al­ly seen as one of the author­i­ties over the ele­ment of Earth. He is also an angel of air & of the West. He is also a rul­ing angel over Tues­day.

In Islam­ic lore he was called “Luma’il” & invoked in rites of exor­cism.

His name was mis­tran­scribed & iden­ti­fied with Lucifer­’s through the writ­ings of Gri­moires & mys­tics such as Made­line Mon­tal­ban. In the vari­a­tion used: “Lumiel”, the name is said to mean “Light of God”, how­ev­er, this is a greek root “Lumin” (light) & a Semit­ic suf­fix “El” (God) thus the title is invent­ed & not orig­i­nal. In Greek the name would be “Heylel” & in Greek it would be “heusol­u­men” or “Lumen­theus.”

I will post up his script here in a few days.

~Ari’el

Yahushua

10

Ischim

Mar 26, 2011#4

I am still wait­ing for the script?
“Nil nisi clavis deest.
Si talia jun­gere pos­sis sit tibi scire satis”
Quote
Share

 

Ariel of Megadriel

6587

Aeon

Mar 26, 2011#5

Here are some sig­ils asso­ci­at­ed with Lumiel (Lamael)…

I will post up descrip­tions for them tomor­row.
~Ari’el

 

xion

14

Ischim

Mar 29, 2011#6

Are the mark­ings images of fix­es Behen­ian Stars? what are they iden­ti­fied from? Is l’Lu­miel” asso­ci­at­ed with any par­tic­u­lar key?

 

Lamael

3

Ischim

 

g 20, 2011#7

Although Ariel’s break­down of the com­po­nents of the name Lamael may be cor­rect, Lamael is “In the Light of the Source”. Lamael has been incar­nate through­out his­to­ry. His mis­sion has been the ide­al of Christ, “the lib­er­a­tion of human­i­ty from the illu­sion of sep­a­ra­tion found­ed upon love and com­pas­sion”. Lamael was Akhen­aton, asso­ci­at­ed with Moses, knew and was very close to Jesus, etc. The mis­sion has always been one, the guis­es have been many. The task is not done yet. I have no tan­gi­ble proof to give you on any of these things, so sense it for your­self and decide. There is but one uni­ver­sal truth… “The Source Is Infi­nite”. If you want to see where the rab­bit hole goes, there is a book called “Free of Illu­sion”.

That may be an inter­pre­ta­tion of the name but “light of the source” is not a cor­rect translit­er­a­tion.

Lumin is a Greek root — the gen­i­tive sin­gu­lar form of “lumi” — mean­ing “to shine”.

El is a Semit­ic suf­fix mean­ing: “deity / divine­ly mighty one / God”.

In Semit­ic form, the name “light of God” would be “Heylel” & in Greek it would be “heusol­u­men” or “Lumen­theus.”

The root for Lamael comes from “la’­ma” or “lama”, an Ara­ma­ic form of the ear­li­er Semit­ic root “l’ma”. (In Hebrew, it is tra­di­tion­al­ly “lema”.) It is a com­pos­ite of two prim­i­tive roots: “la’ah” (mean­ing: weary or impa­tient) & “mah” (mean­ing: what / how / why?). In its basic form, it trans­lates as “why?” & indi­cates a plea for answers.
(It is best known in translit­er­a­tion from Ara­ma­ic in Jesus’ cry on the cross of: “Eloi Eloi Lama Sabachthani” — “My God, My God, why have you left me?!”)

In Greek translit­er­a­tion, it is still “lama” & means the same (“why”). How­ev­er, it is only used in the con­text of the Aramaic/Hebrew trans­la­tion. “Lama” is not relat­ed to “Lumi”. It is not even a vari­a­tion of a nat­ur­al Greek root. The vari­ant of the name in Greek would be “Lamael”, the same as in Ara­ma­ic since it is a direct trans­la­tion. In Hebrew it would be “Lemael” or “Lemiel”. The vari­a­tion “Lumiel” is not Greek, it is a tran­scrip­tion error of the Hebrew name, & pre­dis­posed to be based on the Greek root lumin: “to shine.”

Lumiel / Lamael is a Semit­ic name mean­ing basi­cal­ly: “the ques­tion of God”, as an indi­ca­tion of ques­tion­ing the mys­tery or secrets behind an unknown plan (i.e. God’s plan). My break­down of the com­po­nents of the name could not have been cor­rect if the cor­rect trans­la­tion was “light of the source.”

I am not say­ing that there is no angel with that title or mean­ing, but trans­la­tion of the name “Lumael” as “light of the source” is called ‘folk’ inter­pre­ta­tion. It is an applied mean­ing of the name & not based in its actu­al trans­la­tion / ety­mol­o­gy. It con­cerns me when it is applied as a con­crete trans­la­tion in an angelol­o­gy forum.

~Ari’el

 

xion

14

Ischim

 

Ari’el…

I am not argu­ing as to the literal/etymological break­down of the name. I am just let­ting you know that Lamael is asso­ci­at­ed with “in the light of the Source”.

That’s all…

As for what Yeshua said on the cross, well, one would have had to be there and remem­ber. Maybe he said “Lamael” ;)

…see you in the breeze (and thanks for the info)

 

Ariel of Megadriel

6587

Aeon

 

Aug 21, 2011#12

Lamael @ Aug 20 2011, 07:46 PM wrote:I am not argu­ing as to the literal/etymological break­down of the name. I am just let­ting you know that Lamael is asso­ci­at­ed with “in the light of the Source”.

I under­stand. I was attempt­ing to clar­i­fy because the word­ing of your post implied trans­la­tion. As an angelol­o­gy forum it is impor­tant to elab­o­rate on cer­tain knowl­edge if it is some­what vague or con­tra­dic­to­ry, as it can be mis­lead­ing in any direc­tion. (It is not my job to point out direc­tion, but to elab­o­rate that there are sev­er­al direc­tions, typ­i­cal­ly, in angel infor­ma­tion.)

The trans­la­tion of Lumiel to mean “Light of God”, is very com­mon in mys­ti­cism involved in Gnos­tic ori­gins. Gnos­ti­cism relat­ed mys­ti­cism did adopt many Hebrew — Greek translit­er­at­ed names as mean­ing both the Hebrew form & Greek form in com­bi­na­tion. It also got some titles con­fused with Latin terms, such as “Luci”. The names Luciel, Lucifel, & Lumiel are all equat­ed in Gnos­tic mys­ti­cism with Lucifer.

The basis of this was the belief of Gnos­tic sys­tems that most ancient myth & mys­ti­cism was inter­re­lat­ed & sym­bol­ic. It did not mat­ter what a per­fect ety­mol­o­gy brought because ety­mol­o­gy itself was also a form of the spir­i­tu­al ‘prison’ of world­ly things. World­ly “truth” is con­sid­ered an oxy­moron in Gnos­ti­cism, and the ety­mol­o­gy of a name fit in this cat­e­go­ry. The goal of Gnos­tic mys­ti­cism was to con­nect sym­bol­ism in order to expose spir­i­tu­al truth.

Xion,
Lamael is com­mon­ly asso­ci­at­ed with prop­er­ties of Venus (direct­ly cor­re­lat­ed with those asso­ci­a­tions with the title “Lucifer” described above). As “Lumiel”, he has been attrib­uted some author­i­ty over the fixed star “Sir­ius” (Σείριος, Sopdet, Soth­is). This is the only Behen­ian fixed star which is attached to the course of Venus alone. (There are oth­er Behen­ian stars who share prop­er­ties of Venus & a sec­ond plan­et.)

The above sig­ils are not direct­ly asso­ci­at­ed with Behen­ian stars, though some do include sym­bols of Venus. I will fin­ish the above post in the next few days with descrip­tions of the known sym­bols.

i know your method is log­i­cal in response and infor­ma­tive. I also feel you are a tremen­dous guid­ing force for many with seri­ous­ly deep spir­i­tu­al sit­u­a­tions.

I must be fair­ly rigid to keep the right ‘atmos­phere’ on these forums. There are no ‘focused’ forums ded­i­cat­ed sole­ly to angelol­o­gy that I have seen. The usu­al traf­fic here is vis­i­tors who have a direct ques­tion or want to scan all the posts for infor­ma­tion. They typ­i­cal­ly vis­it for a cou­ple of days & then become inac­tive. There are also vis­i­tors who start dis­cus­sions that are very eso­teric & vague, usu­al­ly imply­ing that they have knowl­edge that is con­tra­dic­to­ry to what is assumed in angelol­o­gy. They also become inac­tive very quick­ly, usu­al­ly before offer­ing any elab­o­ra­tion. So, while dis­cus­sion & inter­pre­ta­tion is encour­aged here, it is impor­tant to make sure the posts con­tain sourced infor­ma­tion.

In the days of Noah there were angels on the Earth the Watch­ers, being the end times per­haps we will be see­ing some­thing of this nature again..what are your thoughts on this.

In the time of the Watch­ers, the pop­u­la­tion was dev­as­tat­ed by flood because so many had been direct­ly influ­enced by their cor­rup­tion. In all major flood myths, it was not a sur­prise that the Earth had been cor­rupt­ed. The flood & pun­ish­ment of the Grig­ori was a reac­tion to the cries of man. The judg­ment placed on the Watch­ers was severe & bind­ing. Though there is myth that some may be ‘wan­der­ing’, it seems unlike­ly that the same inci­dent of Watch­ers descend­ing would occur. Though, more angels on earth, in gen­er­al, is a com­mon theme in escha­tol­ogy (the study of the end times).

~Ari’el

 

 

Sep 19, 2011#13

From my per­spec­tive this forum is a study in and of itself. I enjoy learn­ing about angels like Lamael and what not, those I have heard lit­tle to none of. I enjoy ari’el pulling up ref­er­ences for me to read. And I enjoy learn­ing which angels peo­ple are inter­est­ed in. I find the nature of dis­cus­sion fit­ting in this top­ic to the ear­ly def­i­n­i­tion of Lumiel’s name.

 

Ariel of Megadriel

6587

Aeon

 

Sep 19, 2011#14

I’m glad to hear that, as it is what the forum is intend­ed to be. Angelol­o­gy is a sub-genre of the­ol­o­gy, but it gets very lit­tle atten­tion in the­o­log­i­cal dis­cus­sion. It is also often a depar­ture from reli­gion to dis­cuss angels at length, & that is prob­a­bly one of the rea­sons most the­ol­o­gists keep a lim­it­ed amount of research on angels but do not focus on them entire­ly.

The sad real­i­ty is, though there is much infor­ma­tion on angels that has been record­ed, very lit­tle has ever been com­piled togeth­er. There are only a hand­ful of books who list angels by name & real­ly give in depth infor­ma­tion.

This means less­er known angels who ‘could’ be giv­en ‘biogra­phies’ full of infor­ma­tion are usu­al­ly only known by one or two sen­tences sum­ming up their known his­to­ry. Books such as Gus­tav David­son’s Dic­tio­nary of Angels must have this approach because they would be too large if each descrip­tion was elab­o­rat­ed to the fullest. There is sim­ply too much angel infor­ma­tion out there for one vol­ume & so there is no real source for the bulk of angelol­o­gy. One day, per­haps Megadriel.com will change that.

And it is dis­cus­sions, such as the ety­mol­o­gy of Lumiel’s name, which ‘flesh out’ the biogra­phies of the less­er known angels.

~Ari’el

 

xion

14

Ischim

 

Sep 20, 2011#15

I think this forum is chang­ing that. I am glad i found it. you find­ings and knowl­edge is grounded..often things seem mul­ti-lev­el as I study but this forum keeps me ground­ed. I still am try­ing to wrap my head around the fall­en angels,watchers..I for some rea­son see them as dif­fer­ent groups from dif­fer­ent “fall­en ” peri­ods of time..like the abyss seems to have fall­en before all . just work­ing through per­spec­tives maybe.

thanks for being here though.

Aug 21, 2011#10

Thank you for the email. i think what you are doing is won­der­ful Ariel..

i know your method is log­i­cal in response and infor­ma­tive. I also feel you are a tremen­dous guid­ing force for many with seri­ous­ly deep spir­i­tu­al sit­u­a­tions. The Bible leaves ref­er­ence to the sec­ond com­ing of Christ
it is a brief state­ment as in the days of Noah.In the days of Noah there were angels on the Earth the Watch­ers, being the end times per­haps
we will be see­ing some­thing of this nature again..what are your thoughts on this.

xion

Author: mayet

Mirror Mirror on the wall, Who is the Faerest of us all? The Truth are we in the skies you see, The Balance of Fire And Water is Elektricity.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *