Simon Eager, Stream Compliance Officer, acting as an avatar for North Burnett Council, Failed to follow legislation and procedures and breached sections 94 and 127 of the ANIMAL MANAGEMENT (CATS AND DOGS) ACT 2008. in declaring Hunta a regulated dog as per your email of the 23rd of dec 2024 and attaching a destruction notice in the same email.
yet your email stated as is the “block Catchnet’ voice from council is “the matter is under investigation”
“Good afternoon Nina, With respect to your dog Hunta, currently impounded and under investigation for dog attack offences, please see the attached documents.”
Now we can sit and talk pie all day, going around in circles in a feedback loop, or I can pick up the strong string of the stream and examine is with fine tooth mirror.
feedback loop see Pi and compare it to your distraction and diversion game of feedback loop on the above, as below.
section 129 Breach
you served a regulated dog notice and a destruction notice in the same email.
You stated in your email to NINA on the 23rd Dec 2024, i note that it is the first written correspondence she has received about this matter, that you had put material in the mail for her last week. Her mailbox is empty up to today with no mail from you.. Breach Lie
Your regulated dog notice was dated 19th of December and yet you did not inform Nina until the 22nd of December by telephone and no written correspondance.
In order to declare a dog a regulated dog you must inform the owner in writing of your INTENTION to declare the dog a regulated dog.
After the owner (Nina) receives the Intention to declare Hunta by written notice, containg all information and evidence the council has on the case (transparency in council)she has 14 days to prepare a response and to contact legal assistance.
That is intention to issue the notice a step or two before issuing the notice.
I have listened to monologs of conversation from 3 different representatives of the council that represent this stream. These three conversations were full of word salad in the effort to bind and deceive NINA in your effort to appease an resident by making a “scapegoat” out of the most beautiful innocent loving dog put on this earyh by GOD.
In those three conversation each time Nina asked one thing of the workers and that was to provide proof that Hunta was responsible for killing a goat.
In response to her question, nina was diverted, talked over in a condescending way and told she was not listening to the workers. She was also told each and every time that the matter is under investigation and yet she received no letter and no emails until yesterday which breach legislation by combining the two letters in one. and yet every day nina has contacted council from the day her dogs went missing. each time the block wall of “it is under investigstion”
May I ask you, will you listen to someone trying to excuse themselves using “council” disguise murdering a family member?
I was listening very closely as were several other people in the rooms at the time.
These are the words recorded coming from all of your workers.
“I think” “I believe” “we suspect” “we believe” “we think” “we have reasonable suspicion” “catch net” – caught 😉
Those words are meaningless and have no place in the world today of truth.
Each instance of phone calls to NINA you displayed a disgusting superior attitude that overtly appeared like you had a lot to say about nothing.
covertly the subterfuge was subtle but visible.
I direct you back to Nina’s and now my question – will you please provide proof that hunta is responsible for a killing a goat?
I also direct you, the “stream compliance officer” to examine this “event” from true grounding of looking at a situation from all around and not just a black white authoritarian stance of ok we have a complaint –Let kill it ?
you have made a very hasty, deadly conclusion based on bias and prejudice. Hunta has no prejudice, go and meet her beautiful soul, she will love you even up to the moment the needle you are killing her with goes in. This is when justice and those who preform their duties under truths banner, blindfold themselves to truth, the very government becomes a decaying injustice.
You see I went around to visit a sister the other day, and she offered me a meal, because I was so damned hungry after running around exploring all day, I gratefully accepted and demolished that pi.
I didn’t ask where she got the pie from or if she had to kill a magpie to make it and I certainly will not walk out her door to be caught, netted, chained, caged then crucified| Nor caught in a pong catchnet of wordsalaed
what exactly are you killing, killing the problem by appeasing your rate payer at the detriment of a the heart of grandmother and all her family and friends?
That would make you guilty of murdering an innocent animal set on earth by GOD because you have that power over others.
Have you met the dog you are murdering? Have you looked in her eyes?
I will you to look into HUNTas eyes and tell that dog you are killing her because you think, you believe and you suspect that she ate a meal when she was hungry was set in front of her by her big brother.
Hunta’s Voice
Section 89 Power to make declaration
(1) Simon Failed to follow correct procedures by not complying with this section of the act.
92 Withdrawing proposed declaration notice
The local government may withdraw the proposed declaration
notice by giving notice of the withdrawal to any owner of the
dog the subject of the notice.
Please do, I have better things to do than be dragged back into mans ego and power war. Honestly, it is like an old rusty battery, a bunch of neutrons stirring up the elektrons and protons. Go and gaze at a sunflower and breathe.
Having said that, I hold fast! The more you try to put bandaids on and cover up your illegal acts, the more they show themselves to me, the one and the manyones.
it stops here|
The world is over it. Using confusion, word salad and illegal acts to further your own agenda and trample on people and loving animals end.
