Destruction order of a DOG GOD Hunta The Hunted

copy of the destruc­tion order here  dat­ed 19th of DECMEBER 2024
slideshow will be added for eas­i­er access to visu­al expe­ri­ence of an illu­sion wrapped up as “gov­ern­ment Local gov­er­nance”
destruc­tion-order .docx for­mat  

A copy of the reg­u­lat­ed dog notice served with the destruc­tion notice. Please note ALL of 127

act-2008–074 
there is more snip­pets on oth­er pages and they will all link up I am only 24 hours into the new mythos fea­tur­ing the great roast­ing and feast­ing of the ole sim­ple simon, because sion does not say.

I am link­ing this and I would real­ly like to show you the way your local coun­cil works, by stu­pe­fy­ing  and bam­boozel­ing peo­ple that they do not think can stand up for them­selves.

Inno­cent ani­mals fol­low­ing nature their nose and a feed.

I ask who is the evil ones?
Pi Solved Lama - the feed­back loop that is today designed to keep you going in cir­cles

sec­tion 127 link onsite here Sec­tion 127 with rel­e­vant info high­light­ed

94 Mak­ing reg­u­lat­ed dog dec­la­ra­tion
(1) The local gov­ern­ment must con­sid­er any writ­ten
rep­re­sen­ta­tions and evi­dence accom­pa­ny­ing them with­in the
peri­od stat­ed in the pro­posed dec­la­ra­tion notice.
(2) If, after com­ply­ing with sub­sec­tion (1), the local gov­ern­ment
is sat­is­fied that the rel­e­vant ground under sec­tion 89 still
exists, it must make the reg­u­lat­ed dog dec­la­ra­tion for the dog.
95 Giv­ing infor­ma­tion notice about deci­sion to make
reg­u­lat­ed dog dec­la­ra­tion
(1) As soon as prac­ti­ca­ble after decid­ing to make a reg­u­lat­ed dog
dec­la­ra­tion, the local gov­ern­ment must give any own­er of the
dog the sub­ject of the dec­la­ra­tion an infor­ma­tion notice about
the deci­sion.
(2) How­ev­er, the local gov­ern­ment must not give an infor­ma­tion
notice under sub­sec­tion (1) if an autho­rised per­son has made a
destruc­tion order under sec­tion 127A in rela­tion to the dog.
Note— we have a pot named jack,

it is sim­ple; Simon the over eager beaver was in such a ruch he breached law by send­ing both the reg­u­lat­ed dog notice and the destruc­tion notice in the same email. Yes my spelling is shit but their spelling is worse when you see it in the mir­ror from the side. Crazy eh 🙂

See sec­tion 127A in rela­tion to the require­ment to give a sin­gle
infor­ma­tion notice about the deci­sions to make the reg­u­lat­ed dog
dec­la­ra­tion and the destruc­tion order.
(3) The deci­sion takes effect on the lat­er of the fol­low­ing days—
(a) the day any own­er of the dog is giv­en the infor­ma­tion
notice;
(b) a lat­er day of effect stat­ed in the infor­ma­tion notice.
(4) The infor­ma­tion notice must state—
(a) that the dog is the sub­ject of—
(i) if the dog is a dan­ger­ous dog—a dan­ger­ous dog
dec­la­ra­tion; or
(ii) if the dog is a men­ac­ing dog—a men­ac­ing dog
dec­la­ra­tion; and
(b) the rea­sons for the dec­la­ra­tion; and
© the local gov­ern­ment that made the dec­la­ra­tion; and
[s 96]
Ani­mal Man­age­ment (Cats and Dogs) Act 2008
Chap­ter 4 Reg­u­lat­ed dogs
Cur­rent as at 28 August 2024 Page 69
Autho­rised by the Par­lia­men­tary Coun­sel
(d) the day the deci­sion takes effect; and
(e) that the dog must be kept only at the place stat­ed in the
reg­is­tra­tion notice as the address for the dog; and
(f) if the dog is impounded—a unique num­ber giv­en to the
dog by the local gov­ern­ment for the pur­pos­es of
impound­ing; and
(g) any oth­er infor­ma­tion pre­scribed under a reg­u­la­tion

126A What is a destruc­tion order
A destruc­tion order, in rela­tion to a dog, is an order made by
an autho­rised per­son stat­ing that the autho­rised per­son
pro­pos­es to destroy the dog not ear­li­er than 14 days after the
notice is served under this part.
127 Destruc­tion of reg­u­lat­ed dog or pro­hib­it­ed dog in
par­tic­u­lar cir­cum­stances
(1) This sec­tion applies if the dog is a reg­u­lat­ed dog or a
pro­hib­it­ed dog.
(2) The autho­rised per­son may, with­out notice giv­en to an own­er
of or respon­si­ble per­son for the dog, imme­di­ate­ly destroy the
dog if—
(a) the autho­rised per­son rea­son­ably believes the dog is
dan­ger­ous and the autho­rised per­son can not con­trol the
dog; or
(b) an own­er of the dog has asked the autho­rised per­son to
destroy the dog.
(3) Also, the autho­rised per­son may destroy the dog not ear­li­er
than 3 days after seiz­ing the dog if—
[s 127AA]
Ani­mal Man­age­ment (Cats and Dogs) Act 2008
Chap­ter 5 Inves­ti­ga­tion, mon­i­tor­ing and enforce­ment
Page 90 Cur­rent as at 28 August 2024
Autho­rised by the Par­lia­men­tary Coun­sel
(a) the dog—
(i) has no reg­is­tered own­er, or appar­ent­ly has no
reg­is­tered own­er; and
(ii) is not the sub­ject of a reg­u­lat­ed dog dec­la­ra­tion
made by the rel­e­vant local gov­ern­ment; and
(b) nei­ther the autho­rised per­son nor the rel­e­vant local
gov­ern­ment knows who is an own­er of, or a respon­si­ble
per­son for, the dog.

127AA Destruc­tion of reg­u­lat­ed dog or pro­hib­it­ed dog under
destruc­tion order
(1) This sec­tion applies if—
(a) the dog is a reg­u­lat­ed dog or a pro­hib­it­ed dog; and
(b) sec­tion 127 does not autho­rise the destruc­tion of the
dog.
(2) If the dog has seri­ous­ly attacked a per­son or an ani­mal, the
autho­rised per­son must make a destruc­tion order in rela­tion to
the dog.
(3) If the dog has not seri­ous­ly attacked a per­son or an ani­mal, the
autho­rised per­son may make a destruc­tion order in rela­tion to
the dog.
(4) The destruc­tion order must—
(a) be served on—
(i) the reg­is­tered own­er of the dog; or
(ii) if there is no reg­is­tered own­er of the dog—any
per­son who is an own­er of, or a respon­si­ble per­son
for, the dog; and
(b) include or be accom­pa­nied by an infor­ma­tion notice
about the deci­sion to make the destruc­tion order.
(5) If a destruc­tion order is made in rela­tion to the dog, the
autho­rised per­son may destroy the dog, not ear­li­er than 14
days after the order is served under sub­sec­tion (4) if an
appli­ca­tion has not been made under chap­ter 8, part 1 for an
[s 127AA]
Ani­mal Man­age­ment (Cats and Dogs) Act 2008
Chap­ter 5 Inves­ti­ga­tion, mon­i­tor­ing and enforce­ment
Cur­rent as at 28 August 2024 Page 91
Autho­rised by the Par­lia­men­tary Coun­sel
inter­nal review of the deci­sion to make the destruc­tion order
(the destruc­tion order deci­sion).
(6) If an appli­ca­tion for inter­nal review has been made under
chap­ter 8, part 1 for an inter­nal review of the destruc­tion order
deci­sion, the autho­rised per­son may destroy the dog if—
(a) the appli­ca­tion has been decid­ed and both of the
fol­low­ing apply—
(i) the deci­sion on the appli­ca­tion con­firms the
destruc­tion order deci­sion;
(ii) an appli­ca­tion for an exter­nal review of the
destruc­tion order deci­sion has not been made
with­in the peri­od allowed under the QCAT Act; or
(b) the appli­ca­tion has been with­drawn or has oth­er­wise
end­ed.
(7) If an appli­ca­tion has been made for an exter­nal review of the
destruc­tion order deci­sion, the autho­rised per­son may destroy
the dog if—
(a) the appli­ca­tion has been decid­ed and both of the
fol­low­ing apply—
(i) the deci­sion on the appli­ca­tion (the exter­nal review
deci­sion) con­firms the destruc­tion order deci­sion;
(ii) an appeal against the exter­nal review deci­sion has
not been start­ed with­in the peri­od allowed under
the QCAT Act; or
(b) the appli­ca­tion has been with­drawn or has oth­er­wise
end­ed.
(8) If an appeal against the exter­nal review deci­sion has been
start­ed, the autho­rised per­son may destroy the dog if—
(a) the appeal has been decid­ed and the effect of the
deci­sion is to con­firm the exter­nal review deci­sion; or
(b) the appeal has been with­drawn or has oth­er­wise end­ed.
(9) In this sec­tion—
ani­mal has the mean­ing giv­en by sec­tion 191.
[s 127A]
Ani­mal Man­age­ment (Cats and Dogs) Act 2008
Chap­ter 5 Inves­ti­ga­tion, mon­i­tor­ing and enforce­ment
Page 92 Cur­rent as at 28 August 2024
Autho­rised by the Par­lia­men­tary Coun­sel
seri­ous­ly attack means—
(a) in rela­tion to a person—attack the per­son in a way that
caus­es the death of, or griev­ous bod­i­ly harm or bod­i­ly
harm to, the per­son; or
(b) in rela­tion to an animal—attack the ani­mal in a way that
caus­es the death of the ani­mal, or maims or wounds the
ani­mal.
127A Con­cur­rent reg­u­lat­ed dog dec­la­ra­tion and destruc­tion
order
(1) This sec­tion applies if a local gov­ern­ment—
(a) has made a reg­u­lat­ed dog dec­la­ra­tion under sec­tion 94
for the dog; but
(b) has not giv­en the own­er of the dog an infor­ma­tion notice
under sec­tion 95 about the deci­sion to make the
dec­la­ra­tion.
(2) Even though the reg­u­lat­ed dog dec­la­ra­tion has not tak­en effect
under sec­tion 95(3), an autho­rised offi­cer may make a
destruc­tion order for the dog.
(3) As soon as prac­ti­ca­ble after decid­ing to make the destruc­tion
order for the dog, the autho­rised per­son must serve the
destruc­tion order on—
(a) the reg­is­tered own­er of the dog; or
(b) if there is no reg­is­tered own­er of the dog—a per­son who
is an own­er of, or a respon­si­ble per­son for, the dog.
(4) The destruc­tion order must include or be accom­pa­nied by a
sin­gle infor­ma­tion notice about—
(a) the deci­sion to make the reg­u­lat­ed dog dec­la­ra­tion under
sec­tion 94(2); and
(b) the deci­sion to make the destruc­tion order.
(5) Sec­tion 127AA(5) to (8) applies to the destruc­tion order.

 

I stepped into this stu­pid bat­tle, to place my sword of truth between a beau­ti­ful heart in a fam­i­ly of heart defend. My fan­tas­tic good friend and grand­moth­er who is being bom­bard­ed by a nuclear xray machine,  not by fool­ish choic­es and yet the fool made the choice. Im not here for fame nor for­tune, I am Hunta’s voice and some­one should ask theS­im  Sime­on tem­plar if you are noth­ing with noth­ing, how do oyu take noth­ing away from noth­ing?

Sim­ply put in the “catch­net” I jumped out of I will not per­mit the vodou sac­ri­fi­cial mur­der of Hunta to sat­is­fy and appease male egos.

end slaugh­ter ends/endit|

I know Hunta. She is so beau­ti­ful so gen­tle and so lov­ing. who HAS the GOD giv­en right to Mur­der Gods Inno­cent Earth CHil­dren  — San­i­mal The Sen­ti­nent Ani­mal.

 
Mona Lisa
they had you all along