Simon The Eager — Hunta’s Voice

Simon Eager, Stream Com­pli­ance Offi­cer, act­ing as an avatar for North Bur­nett Coun­cil, Failed to fol­low leg­is­la­tion and pro­ce­dures and breached sec­tions 94 and 127 of the ANIMAL MANAGEMENT (CATS AND DOGS) ACT 2008. in declar­ing Hunta a reg­u­lat­ed dog as per your email of the 23rd of dec 2024 and attach­ing a destruc­tion notice in the same email.

 yet your email stat­ed as is the “block Catch­net’ voice from coun­cil is “the mat­ter is under inves­ti­ga­tion”

“Good after­noon Nina, With respect to your dog Hunta, cur­rent­ly impound­ed and under inves­ti­ga­tion for dog attack offences, please see the attached doc­u­ments.”

 

Now we can sit and talk pie all day, going around in cir­cles in a feed­back loop, or I can pick up the strong string of the stream and exam­ine is with fine tooth mir­ror.

feed­back loop see Pi and com­pare it to your dis­trac­tion and diver­sion game of feed­back loop on the above, as below.

sec­tion 129 Breach
you served a reg­u­lat­ed dog notice and a destruc­tion notice in the same email.

You stat­ed in your email to NINA on the 23rd Dec 2024, i note that it is the first writ­ten cor­re­spon­dence she has received about this mat­ter, that you had put mate­r­i­al in the mail for her last week. Her mail­box is emp­ty up to today with no mail from you.. Breach Lie 

Your reg­u­lat­ed dog notice was dat­ed 19th of Decem­ber and yet you did not inform Nina until the 22nd of Decem­ber by tele­phone and no writ­ten cor­re­spon­dance.

In order to declare a dog a reg­u­lat­ed dog you must inform the own­er in writ­ing of your INTENTION to declare the dog a reg­u­lat­ed dog.
After the own­er (Nina) receives the Inten­tion to declare Hunta by writ­ten notice, con­taing all infor­ma­tion and evi­dence the coun­cil has on the case (trans­paren­cy in council)she has 14 days to pre­pare a response and to con­tact legal assis­tance.

That is inten­tion to issue the notice a step or two before issu­ing the notice.

I have lis­tened to monologs of con­ver­sa­tion from 3 dif­fer­ent rep­re­sen­ta­tives of the coun­cil that rep­re­sent this stream. These three con­ver­sa­tions were full of word sal­ad in the effort to bind and deceive NINA in your effort to appease an res­i­dent by mak­ing a “scape­goat” out of the most beau­ti­ful inno­cent lov­ing dog put on this earyh by GOD.

In those three con­ver­sa­tion each time Nina asked one thing of the work­ers and that was to pro­vide proof that Hunta was respon­si­ble for killing a goat.

In response to her ques­tion, nina was divert­ed, talked over in a con­de­scend­ing way and told she was not lis­ten­ing to the work­ers. She was also told each and every time that the mat­ter is under inves­ti­ga­tion and yet she received no let­ter and no emails until yes­ter­day which breach leg­is­la­tion by com­bin­ing the two let­ters in one. and yet every day nina has con­tact­ed coun­cil from the day her dogs went miss­ing. each time the block wall of “it is under inves­tigstion”

May I ask you, will you lis­ten to some­one try­ing to excuse them­selves using “coun­cil” dis­guise mur­der­ing a fam­i­ly mem­ber?

I was lis­ten­ing very close­ly as were sev­er­al oth­er peo­ple in the rooms at the time.

These are the words record­ed com­ing from all of your work­ers.

“I think” “I believe” “we sus­pect” “we believe” “we think” “we have rea­son­able sus­pi­cion” “catch net” — caught 😉

Those words are mean­ing­less and have no place in the world today of truth.

Each instance of phone calls to NINA you dis­played a dis­gust­ing supe­ri­or atti­tude that overt­ly appeared like you had a lot to say about noth­ing.
covert­ly the sub­terfuge was sub­tle but vis­i­ble.

I direct you back to Nina’s and now my ques­tion — will you please pro­vide proof that hunta is respon­si­ble for a killing a goat?

I also direct you, the “stream com­pli­ance offi­cer” to exam­ine this “event” from true ground­ing of look­ing at a sit­u­a­tion from all around and not just a black white author­i­tar­i­an stance of ok we have a com­plaint –Let kill it ?

you have made a very hasty, dead­ly con­clu­sion based on bias and prej­u­dice. Hunta has no prej­u­dice, go and meet her beau­ti­ful soul, she will love you even up to the moment the nee­dle you are killing her with goes in. This is when jus­tice and those who pre­form their duties under truths ban­ner, blind­fold them­selves to truth, the very gov­ern­ment becomes a decay­ing injus­tice.

You see I went around to vis­it a sis­ter the oth­er day, and she offered me a meal, because I was so damned hun­gry after run­ning around explor­ing all day, I grate­ful­ly accept­ed and demol­ished that pi.

I did­n’t ask where she got the pie from or if she had to kill a mag­pie to make it and I cer­tain­ly will not walk out her door to be caught, net­ted, chained, caged then cru­ci­fied| Nor caught in a pong catch­net of word­salaed

what exact­ly are you killing, killing the prob­lem by appeas­ing your rate pay­er at the detri­ment of a the heart of grand­moth­er and all her fam­i­ly and friends?

That would make you guilty of mur­der­ing an inno­cent ani­mal set on earth by GOD because you have that pow­er over oth­ers.

Have you met the dog you are mur­der­ing? Have you looked in her eyes?

I will you to look into HUNTas eyes and tell that dog you are killing her because you think, you believe and you sus­pect that she ate a meal when she was hun­gry was set in front of her by her big broth­er.

 

Hunta’s Voice

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sec­tion 89 Pow­er to make dec­la­ra­tion
(1) Simon Failed to fol­low cor­rect pro­ce­dures by not com­ply­ing with this sec­tion of the act.

92 With­draw­ing pro­posed dec­la­ra­tion notice
The local gov­ern­ment may with­draw the pro­posed dec­la­ra­tion
notice by giv­ing notice of the with­draw­al to any own­er of the
dog the sub­ject of the notice.

Please do, I have bet­ter things to do than be dragged back into mans ego and pow­er war. Hon­est­ly, it is like an old rusty bat­tery, a bunch of neu­trons stir­ring up the elek­trons and pro­tons. Go and gaze at a sun­flower and breathe.

Hav­ing said that, I hold fast! The more you try to put bandaids on and cov­er up your ille­gal acts, the more they show them­selves to me, the one and the many­ones.

it stops here|

The world is over it. Using con­fu­sion, word sal­ad and ille­gal acts to fur­ther your own agen­da and tram­ple on peo­ple and lov­ing ani­mals end.