Loading...

Right to Information Act 2009

Find a full copy of the RTI Act 2009 PDF by clicking here RTI_ACT_2009.PDF

Information Access application

Access applications under the Right to Information Act 2009 and Information Privacy Act 2009

The Right to Information Act 2009 (the RTI Act) and the Information Privacy Act 2009 (the IP Act) give a right of access to information held by government, unless, on balance it would be contrary to the public interest to disclose the information.

Before making a formal application, you should contact the relevant agency as information may be already available online, for purchase or by request.  Queensland Government agencies release information administratively and proactively wherever possible.

If the information you are seeking is not available administratively, you may wish to make a formal application. You can apply online for access under the RTI Act or IP Act to information held by Queensland Government departments, agencies and Ministers.

Alternatively, you can download the application form and submit your application by post, fax or email or in person. Find the details of the relevant agency which you’re applying to on our contacts page, as these are not included on the application form.

Credit card payments are accepted as part of the online application process. Credit card details are not accepted for payment of the application fee by email, facsimile or telephone. Please confirm with the agency you are applying to how you should pay your application fee.

You will need to submit your application by downloading the application form if you wish to apply to Queensland agencies other than Government departments or Ministers.

Providing as much information as possible about the documents you are seeking helps the Government department, agency or Minister’s Office identify the documents you are seeking more efficiently. If you know the title, subject matter, agency reference number, type of document or the date it was produced, please specify these details in your application.

Fees and charges apply in varying circumstances. View applicable fees and charges here.

Once you’ve accessed your personal information, you can also apply to amend your personal information under the IP Act if you believe the information is inaccurate, incomplete, out of date or misleading.

Fees and charges

Fees and charges for applications made under the Right to Information Act 2009 (the RTI Act) are set out in the Right to Information Regulation 2009. Charges under the Information Privacy Act 2009 (the IP Act) are set out in the Information Privacy Regulation 2009. The Office of the Information Commissioner publishes a detailed guideline on fees and charges.

The application fees and charges typically increase on 1 July each year. On 1 July 2024 the fees and charges were indexed by 0% (i.e. remain unchanged from 2023–24) in line with the government’s indexation policy. You can contact us to find out details about specific fees, charges or prices.

Below is a summary of the RTI application fee and charges for RTI and IP applications, current from 1 July 2023.

Right to Information

The current application fee for an application under the RTI Act is – $55.75. This fee cannot be waived.

An agency or Minister may impose processing charges on searching for or retrieving documents, and making, or doing things related to making, a decision about an application. An agency or Minister may also impose access charges for providing the documents.

The processing charges for an RTI application are:

  • if the agency or Minister spends less than 5 hours – nil
  • if the agency or Minister spends more than 5 hours processing the application – $8.65 per 15 minutes or part of 15 minutes.

If the agency spends more than 5 hours processing an application, the processing charge applies to every hour. So, if processing takes 6 hours, the processing charge applies to the 6 hours.

The access charges for RTI applications are:

  • for copies of documents provided as a black and white A4 photocopy – $0.25 per page.

Depending on the application, access charges may also include:

  • the actual cost incurred to engage another entity to search for and retrieve a document;
  • the actual cost of relocating a document (for example, the cost of transporting the document from Cairns to Brisbane to give access to an applicant who lives in Brisbane); and
  • the actual cost of transcribing a recording or preparing a written document.

There are no access charges if documents are provided by email or on CD.

The agency or Minister will give you a written estimate (called a charges estimate notice) of how much your application is likely to cost.

Information Privacy

There is no application fee for an application under IP Act, but there may be access charges.

The access charges for IP applications are:

  • for copies of documents provided as a black and white A4 photocopy – $0.25 per page

Depending on the application, access charges may also include:

  • the actual cost incurred to engage another entity to search for and retrieve the document;
  • the actual cost of relocating a document (for example, the cost of transporting the document from Cairns to Brisbane to give access to an applicant who lives in Brisbane); and
  • the actual cost of transcribing a recording or preparing a written document.

There are no access charges if documents are provided by email or on CD.

Waiver of charges

Processing and/or access charges may be waived if:

  • the agency or Minister considers the likely associated costs would be more than the likely amount of the charge;
  • an applicant is in financial hardship (ie holds a specified valid concession card); or
  • the applicant is a non-profit organisation and the Information Commissioner has decided the organisation is in financial hardship.

Payment by credit card

Credit card payments are accepted as part of an online application process. Credit card details are not accepted for payment of the application fee via email, facsimile or telephone.  Please confirm the preferred payment method with the agency you are applying to.

Payment by cheque

If you are paying by cheque, you should make the cheque payable to the agency to which you are applying and post to that agency. Contact details for Queensland government agencies are available here. Contact the agency you are applying to before submitting your application to check whether that agency accepts payments by cheque.

 Back to Top

Last updated:
1 July 2024

The Demonic Government Sacrifice of Hunta.

Nine days ago, An evening visitor, paying respects to Hunta’s sister, who had just delivered babies,  did not latch the front door open as they left.

he left late and saw himself out, Nina and Al went to bed.

The next morning they woke up to find both Nina’s and Al’s dogs missing from the house. Ballsack, Mo, (al’s) Blair and Hunter Nina’s)

all that day they searched high and lo, putting ads on facebook, calling friends to enlist their help and driving for hours calling out, with only silence in reply.

I drove around with Nina two days in a row to the areas they had been spotted. Al and Nina and everyone caring in the village drove around too around. Nothing

Poor al bereft and so locked within himself, I saw him sneak out often to “paint the walls with his tears” so broken and sad and lost without his best mate by his side. and Nina was frantic, trying and thinking of everything she could and then some to find them and bring them home for a big feed.

It was three days when Nina got a call from the lovely beautiful lady at the stockfeeds in Biggenden, she truly is amazing, I buy my bird seed and chicken food there.

 

She had spotted blair limping and bleeding along the side a road and picked her up. The poor girl had he throat ripped open and blood pouring down her.

on the afternoon of the 18th Nina rang council again to see if there was any updates on her missing dogs.  Council admitted that Hunta had be “catchnetted” and was locked up in Gayndah Dog Jail.

The council worker Brooke came to visit Nina on the 19th at 10 am armed with his weapon of choice for the confusion delusion; a voice recorder.

He came on to Ninas property, stuck a microphone in her face when there was no witnesses around and demanded answers to questions. (I will dig deep to find ninas rights there.

As nina told him at the time she was in a state with puffy eyes sneezing and dry and dusty,because she has been cleaning up after a sander and grinder in a room that was being painted.

COuncil illegally bombarded NINA  council stream worker, spoke to Nina and said that Hunta had been found inside a cage and there was a dead goat in there. Some people do listen and NIna was armed, locked and loaded on the “record” button on her phone.

Nina will make a stat  dec on this matter,  that Brooke from council swtiched off his audio recorder before stating the last section (next paragraph) on the fate of Hunta. Nina has requested on each occasion that they furnish her with all their information and proof as part of her response to the Hunta saga. TO be met by the stream workers brick wall, of “you are not listening to me Nina”.  It reminds me of a wonderful parable of “basketball playing bear”.

Brooke stated “after his recorder was switched off”,  council were investigating council were investigating and would let her know when they knew more. He said he knew that Hunta has a beautiful soul and wouldn’t hurt a fly but he had to pass the information on to the compliance officer.

he stated “i am going to take this to the board” and yet we find (Lie)that simple simon was the pieman who just rubber stamped a murder decree not unlike pontus pilate.

What brooke did not inform Nina of was her rights, her rights to have everything in writing, to arrange formal interviews with legal assistance and support with her. And questions in advance and evidence in advance.
Ninas rights wer ejust obliterated as he best buddy was dragged off the the gas chambers of Austwitz.

Nina tried to contact council for updates to no avail. Then a few days later simon says, phoned, the

 

18th at the house on 18th. doing up paperwork voice recorded  talk to you about hunter..interview now I will record you you. brooke
te voice recording i took ended ,

 

destruction order issued

 

NoT-Compliant Breach – Email from Council to Nina AMA act 127 95-2 203 204

Queensland State Law
Animal Control Act QLD 2008 (current)  2008 Animal Management Act  Queensland <-download here
or https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/view/pdf/current/act-2008-074

Making regulated dog declaration

95 Giving information notice about decision to make
regulated dog declaration
(1) As soon as practicable after deciding to make a regulated dog
declaration, the local government must give any owner of the
dog the subject of the declaration an information notice about
the decision.

(2) However, the local government must not give an information
notice under subsection (1) if an authorised person has made a
destruction order under section 127A in relation to the dog.
Note—
See section 127A in relation to the requirement to give a single
information notice about the decisions to make the regulated dog
declaration and the destruction order.
203 Other evidentiary aids
(1) For applying section 198 for the proceeding, a record of a
local government is taken to include—
(a) a thing as follows given, issued, kept or made under this
chapter or chapter 5—
(i) an appointment;
(ii) a decision or record;
[s 204]
Animal Management (Cats and Dogs) Act 2008
Chapter 9 Miscellaneous provisions
Page 142 Current as at 28 August 2024
Authorised by the Parliamentary Counsel
(iii) the local government’s dog registry;
(iv) a regulated dog declaration;
(v) a proposed declaration notice, compliance notice
or other notice;
(vi) a destruction order; and
(b) another document kept under this Act; and
(c) a statement that on a stated day—
(i) a stated person was given a stated decision,
declaration, notice or order; or
(ii) a stated requirement under chapter 4 or 5 was
made of a stated person.
(2) This section does not limit section 198.
204 False or misleading information
A person (the relevant person) commits an offence if the
relevant person gives, either orally or in a document, the
following persons information the relevant person knows is
false or misleading in a material particular—
(a) the chief executive;
(b) a chief executive officer of a local government;
(c) an authorised person;
(d) an authorised implanter;
(e) a licence holder.
Maximum penalty—100 penalty units
Part 3 Legal provisions
Division 1 Evidence generally
198 Evidentiary value of copies
(1) This section applies to a copy of a document that—
(a) purports to be made under the authority of a local
government or its mayor; and
(b) purports to be verified by the mayor or an employee
who is authorised by the local government.
(2) The copy of the document is evidence in any proceedings as if
the copy were the original of the document.

Order Invalid Process not adhered to by non compliant officer.

Good afternoon Nina,

With respect to your dog Hunta, currently impounded and under investigation for dog attack offences, please see the attached documents.

The first one of these is a regulated dog information notice, which tells you that Council has decided to regulate your dog Hunta as a declared ‘dangerous dog’, due to its involvement in a serious dog attack currently under investigation. You will note in this correspondence that you have an option to request an internal review of this decision, which if you choose to take up, you must apply to Council in writing within 14 days of the date of receival of this notice, for the review to be conducted.

The second document attached is a ‘destruction order’, which tells you that Council intends to destroy the dog Hunta, due to its involvement in a serious dog attack involving the death of another animal. Again, there is a review option available for you to apply for an internal review of this decision stating in writing why you think Council should not destroy the dog. If taken up, you need to lodge this review in writing {application form provided} by 4pm on 17th January 2025. If no written response is received Council will proceed to destroy the dog.

Download Regulated Dog Order 
Download Destruction Order for 13 Fredericks Street like what the h*ll name is that?

 

 

Hunta and me!! Why me !!

I know Hunta. She is so beautiful so gentle and so loving. The way she looks at you wiht the most loving eyes and sit at your feet.

who HAS the GOD given right to Murder Gods Innocent Earth CHildren  – Sanimal The Sentinent Animal.

I stepped into this stupid battle, to place my sword of truth between a beautiful heart in a family of hearts and a black arrow that was aimed directly at her heart and her family –  because she is a little bit different, because they could never force her to walk in lines and do as she was told because she is  smarter, witchier more fun and adventurous than manyones and she does not “attach- comply- obey follow- stupid illusions|”|

My fantastic good friend and grandmother is being bombarded by a barrage of bullshit that superman would collapse under,  not by foolish choices and yet the fool made the choice.

Im not here for fame nor fortune, I am Hunta’s voice and someone should ask the Sim  Simeon templar if you are nothing with nothing, how do you take nothing away from nothing?

Also I am here for the popcorn, shitz and giggles laughs and creativity to inspire creativity hand to hand lets beat these doomgooms by shining bright and overcoming their dank soulless misery. Each time one of these fuddduddys steps out I create a whole new world, new stories, new adventures, new books, new character and  a new being that will be much more real to the people showing truth of of a character in mythos and fun and future. So yeah .. each character in this story becomes part of the Qurad story. I take all the constructs of a name and create a whole new world of truth through art, this art is word, Ill play with pictures later. so, Simon becomes simple simon, simon the pieman, simon doesnt says  and all the word play that presents itself in front of me.

So have fun with my pen eager to be.

a sharp reminder, as fun as I make it, and I will make it fun, this is a game of life, Hunta the hunted.
I am blasting seals off each time I see an illusion in the corner of my eye.

it ok, they are not adorable little furry seals, more the navy seals type come in guns ablazing shooting rockets off in all directions and all i have is alil torch and a feather pen. The battlefield of this war is earth, truth showing illusion through fiction not fiction .. hmm friction? nah jut stories for the grandkiddies

I don’t mind if you assume I am crazy, yeppers I am, happy sane in my craziness.  I haven’t changed since I was a wee baby and before and after, I don’t change. Ido shed my skin, outgrow the old and move forward with knowledge.

I input shit and output beautiful perfect soft shiny mirror pearl.

Hunta cannot speak, I am Hunta’s voice.

Mayet
Kheiron Astraea
Margaretruth Swan

no-one

Simply put in the “catchnet” I jumped out .or rolled out I will not permit the vodou sacrificial murder of Hunta to satisfy and appease male egos.

end slaughter ends|

 

Link  to ——-> Justice ripped off the blindfold man chained her with

Link  to ——-> Art and the Jesus COnstruct.

Destruction order of a DOG GOD Hunta The Hunted

copy of the destruction order here  dated 19th of DECMEBER 2024
slideshow will be added for easier access to visual experience of an illusion wrapped up as “government Local governance”
destruction-order .docx format  

A copy of the regulated dog notice served with the destruction notice. Please note ALL of 127

act-2008-074 
there is more snippets on other pages and they will all link up I am only 24 hours into the new mythos featuring the great roasting and feasting of the ole simple simon, because sion does not say.

I am linking this and I would really like to show you the way your local council works, by stupefying  and bamboozeling people that they do not think can stand up for themselves.

Innocent animals following nature their nose and a feed.

I ask who is the evil ones?
Pi Solved Lama – the feedback loop that is today designed to keep you going in circles

section 127 link onsite here Section 127 with relevant info highlighted

94 Making regulated dog declaration
(1) The local government must consider any written
representations and evidence accompanying them within the
period stated in the proposed declaration notice.
(2) If, after complying with subsection (1), the local government
is satisfied that the relevant ground under section 89 still
exists, it must make the regulated dog declaration for the dog.
95 Giving information notice about decision to make
regulated dog declaration
(1) As soon as practicable after deciding to make a regulated dog
declaration, the local government must give any owner of the
dog the subject of the declaration an information notice about
the decision.
(2) However, the local government must not give an information
notice under subsection (1) if an authorised person has made a
destruction order under section 127A in relation to the dog.
Note— we have a pot named jack,


it is simple; Simon the over eager beaver was in such a ruch he breached law by sending both the regulated dog notice and the destruction notice in the same email. Yes my spelling is shit but their spelling is worse when you see it in the mirror from the side. Crazy eh 🙂

See section 127A in relation to the requirement to give a single
information notice about the decisions to make the regulated dog
declaration and the destruction order.
(3) The decision takes effect on the later of the following days—
(a) the day any owner of the dog is given the information
notice;
(b) a later day of effect stated in the information notice.
(4) The information notice must state—
(a) that the dog is the subject of—
(i) if the dog is a dangerous dog—a dangerous dog
declaration; or
(ii) if the dog is a menacing dog—a menacing dog
declaration; and
(b) the reasons for the declaration; and
(c) the local government that made the declaration; and
[s 96]
Animal Management (Cats and Dogs) Act 2008
Chapter 4 Regulated dogs
Current as at 28 August 2024 Page 69
Authorised by the Parliamentary Counsel
(d) the day the decision takes effect; and
(e) that the dog must be kept only at the place stated in the
registration notice as the address for the dog; and
(f) if the dog is impounded—a unique number given to the
dog by the local government for the purposes of
impounding; and
(g) any other information prescribed under a regulation

126A What is a destruction order
A destruction order, in relation to a dog, is an order made by
an authorised person stating that the authorised person
proposes to destroy the dog not earlier than 14 days after the
notice is served under this part.
127 Destruction of regulated dog or prohibited dog in
particular circumstances
(1) This section applies if the dog is a regulated dog or a
prohibited dog.
(2) The authorised person may, without notice given to an owner
of or responsible person for the dog, immediately destroy the
dog if—
(a) the authorised person reasonably believes the dog is
dangerous and the authorised person can not control the
dog; or
(b) an owner of the dog has asked the authorised person to
destroy the dog.
(3) Also, the authorised person may destroy the dog not earlier
than 3 days after seizing the dog if—
[s 127AA]
Animal Management (Cats and Dogs) Act 2008
Chapter 5 Investigation, monitoring and enforcement
Page 90 Current as at 28 August 2024
Authorised by the Parliamentary Counsel
(a) the dog—
(i) has no registered owner, or apparently has no
registered owner; and
(ii) is not the subject of a regulated dog declaration
made by the relevant local government; and
(b) neither the authorised person nor the relevant local
government knows who is an owner of, or a responsible
person for, the dog.

127AA Destruction of regulated dog or prohibited dog under
destruction order
(1) This section applies if—
(a) the dog is a regulated dog or a prohibited dog; and
(b) section 127 does not authorise the destruction of the
dog.
(2) If the dog has seriously attacked a person or an animal, the
authorised person must make a destruction order in relation to
the dog.
(3) If the dog has not seriously attacked a person or an animal, the
authorised person may make a destruction order in relation to
the dog.
(4) The destruction order must—
(a) be served on—
(i) the registered owner of the dog; or
(ii) if there is no registered owner of the dog—any
person who is an owner of, or a responsible person
for, the dog; and
(b) include or be accompanied by an information notice
about the decision to make the destruction order.
(5) If a destruction order is made in relation to the dog, the
authorised person may destroy the dog, not earlier than 14
days after the order is served under subsection (4) if an
application has not been made under chapter 8, part 1 for an
[s 127AA]
Animal Management (Cats and Dogs) Act 2008
Chapter 5 Investigation, monitoring and enforcement
Current as at 28 August 2024 Page 91
Authorised by the Parliamentary Counsel
internal review of the decision to make the destruction order
(the destruction order decision).
(6) If an application for internal review has been made under
chapter 8, part 1 for an internal review of the destruction order
decision, the authorised person may destroy the dog if—
(a) the application has been decided and both of the
following apply—
(i) the decision on the application confirms the
destruction order decision;
(ii) an application for an external review of the
destruction order decision has not been made
within the period allowed under the QCAT Act; or
(b) the application has been withdrawn or has otherwise
ended.
(7) If an application has been made for an external review of the
destruction order decision, the authorised person may destroy
the dog if—
(a) the application has been decided and both of the
following apply—
(i) the decision on the application (the external review
decision) confirms the destruction order decision;
(ii) an appeal against the external review decision has
not been started within the period allowed under
the QCAT Act; or
(b) the application has been withdrawn or has otherwise
ended.
(8) If an appeal against the external review decision has been
started, the authorised person may destroy the dog if—
(a) the appeal has been decided and the effect of the
decision is to confirm the external review decision; or
(b) the appeal has been withdrawn or has otherwise ended.
(9) In this section—
animal has the meaning given by section 191.
[s 127A]
Animal Management (Cats and Dogs) Act 2008
Chapter 5 Investigation, monitoring and enforcement
Page 92 Current as at 28 August 2024
Authorised by the Parliamentary Counsel
seriously attack means—
(a) in relation to a person—attack the person in a way that
causes the death of, or grievous bodily harm or bodily
harm to, the person; or
(b) in relation to an animal—attack the animal in a way that
causes the death of the animal, or maims or wounds the
animal.
127A Concurrent regulated dog declaration and destruction
order
(1) This section applies if a local government—
(a) has made a regulated dog declaration under section 94
for the dog; but
(b) has not given the owner of the dog an information notice
under section 95 about the decision to make the
declaration.
(2) Even though the regulated dog declaration has not taken effect
under section 95(3), an authorised officer may make a
destruction order for the dog.
(3) As soon as practicable after deciding to make the destruction
order for the dog, the authorised person must serve the
destruction order on—
(a) the registered owner of the dog; or
(b) if there is no registered owner of the dog—a person who
is an owner of, or a responsible person for, the dog.
(4) The destruction order must include or be accompanied by a
single information notice about—
(a) the decision to make the regulated dog declaration under
section 94(2); and
(b) the decision to make the destruction order.
(5) Section 127AA(5) to (8) applies to the destruction order.

 

I stepped into this stupid battle, to place my sword of truth between a beautiful heart in a family of heart defend. My fantastic good friend and grandmother who is being bombarded by a nuclear xray machine,  not by foolish choices and yet the fool made the choice. Im not here for fame nor fortune, I am Hunta’s voice and someone should ask theSim  Simeon templar if you are nothing with nothing, how do oyu take nothing away from nothing?

Simply put in the “catchnet” I jumped out of I will not permit the vodou sacrificial murder of Hunta to satisfy and appease male egos.

end slaughter ends/endit|

I know Hunta. She is so beautiful so gentle and so loving. who HAS the GOD given right to Murder Gods Innocent Earth CHildren  – Sanimal The Sentinent Animal.

 
Mona Lisa
they had you all along

Hunta’s Big Side Quest

Hunta was bored,  sister Cat had delivered two adorable white cottonballs in the family wading pool and ALL the spotlight was on Cat in the big room, leaving the crew in the sunroom.

Hunta loved her sister so much but she didn’t love being shut out while Cat was the centre of attention elsewhere, It was the qurad’s job to guard Cat not the househumans.

Hunta The Hunted
Hunta Deathrow Inmate North Burnett Regional Council

Always Cat Cat Cat, Hunta was a bit sad now that she couldn’t have anymore cottonballs since she had that “desex” word thing happen. She was at a loss to understand De-Sex, she was a girl dog, she knew she was a girl dog and always will be a girl dog but since what ever the maskedmonkeymen had done to during the “de-sex” time  and all that horrific her in the pain time after, she  couldn’t have any more cottonballs now and to tell the truth, even though she adored and was so proud of the cottonballs she had created, she didn’t want to create any more cottonballs now, they seem like such an energy draining drag. When she really thought about it there was so much she didn’t want to do now that she had loved before the de-sex pain.

Hunta sighed loudly, as her body rose and fell in time with her sigh, there was an echoing sigh around the room by three other fur bundles all snug and bored and off in their own fantasyland.

Ballsy was in the corner hogging the prime position, watching both the door and the hallway where the house humans were. Ballsy was so named because the HouseHuman Al, had said at the time, that with all Ballsy’s scruffy shaggy weird patchy fur he looked like a sack of balls.

Old Ballsy is just a big tall silly white scruffydog with no much intelligence, at all, he still chases his tail thinking it is a snaky steak to woof down.

Hunta rolled her eyes while she thought about her boofy brother, typical male Ballsy thinks of three things, females, food and footrubs, with no common sense. Damn, you know he is so mixed up that he has one blue eye and two brown, Hunta grinned as she thought of him lovingly, a soft glow of love surrounded Hunta as she tuned her harmony with furfam.

Behind Ballsy, quivering in some dreamland of chasing rabbits, was Mosey along Mo, the beta of the follow the leader Game they all play. Ballsy is senior and bigger than Mo, more boisterous and get up and go. Although we wont say he is smarter, he does have more Alpha Genes than Mosey’on’Mo, so Ballsy is boss cockatoodydoodo.

Suddenly there was a knock at the door startling the four fur bundles into action as they transmuted love into 4 furry barking doorbells as they barked “visitor”.

Ballsy didn’t think the househuman’s noticed the Qurad’s call to the househumans  so he got a wee bit too loud for Hunta’s ears as he barked out “V I S I T O R S’ OVER AND OVER echoed by Mo, Blair and myself Hunta, after all this little ditty is all about me, on backup symphony, I must admit my voice is beautifully musical.

Soon the man of the house answered by thanking Ballsy. He is so nice to thank Ballsy by telling him to shut up. The ALman then invited the houseguest in to pay respects to Mistress Cat and her tiny cottonballs.

We all assumed our positions, 4 curled up furrballs, just laying there thinking about god knows what. Ballsy sighed, followed by Mo. Blair lift one eye to look at me and then she sighed too and closed her eyes.

I sighed and contemplated the new mushroom wall the man househuman was painting. I love the househumans so much, even more than my sisters and brothers, especially when mo farts. When Mo farts even the wood ants pack their bags and march out on strike, all in a row. GROSS -Mo, not the ants they are so cute but I always get them up my nose.

I love chasing them here and there watching their busy little bodies all off doing a job, it must be a very important job because they are very prescise and regimented about their tasks.

They don’t like it when my big sniffy nose chases them around in the grass, they try and hide behind pebbles and twigs but my sniffy nose finds them every time. Some of them run around in circles and some of those really fat one get so cheeky as to try and nibble my nose. When I hunt those rascals down, the little soldiers scatter and run away again as fast as their little six legs can carry them. zip zip away.

I think that is why the beautiful lady of the house, my mistress Nina Noo called me HUNTA, cos I hunt ants all day with my nose in the grass. Who knows, I like to think that is why she called me such a proud name that goes back to my hero dog god, Orion the Hunter.

Orion was our Alpha DOGGOD, when Orion knew something we all did and we knew something Orion did and all the other critters.  Humans took him away from us because he knew too much and they wanted to control us. we just wanted love like we give everyone. I guess everyone is not like Orion and us but a little part of him still lives inside us all.

 

 

I will be writing more and adding to Mayet’s mythos of the Qurad and other adventures of beautiful fun fanasy that is reality.

How ever at the moment Hunta is in Jail with a death notice as a ritual blood sacrifice of evil by old simple simon pieman from yesterdays era.

as you all know with me, or don’t but you soon will if you ride along this fantastic story to bring a shiny warm heartbeam to your soul.

Fear is subjective, what you fear, I have no fear of.

 

 

 

 

learning-from-past-mistakes-tips-for-local-government-prosecutions

Learning from past mistakes – tips for local government prosecutions

Learning from past mistakes – tips for local government prosecutions

 

A successful prosecution requires careful and considered action to be taken by prosecutors from the initial investigation stages, through to the final stages of the enforcement process. There are a number of existing guidelines which provide helpful information on some of the key principles and processes that local enforcement authorities should refer to when exercising their enforcement powers or obligations. In addition, it is also beneficial to reflect on real life examples of cases where a prosecution has or has almost been unsuccessful, so as to pin point what potential issues can arise in such matters and what steps can be taken so that the same problems do not undermine investigations and the success of future prosecutions.

Investigation techniques and the limitations on certain powers

Once a council has concluded that an investigation of an alleged breach is necessary, it is important that a considered and coordinated method for carrying out the investigation is followed by the council, which will require proper record keeping and monitoring of the unauthorised activity to be undertaken. However, before an investigation proceeds to this point, it is critical that the council has confirmed it has the jurisdiction and power to enforce compliance. This is critical so that the investigation or prosecution of a matter is not subsequently challenged by the accused on the basis that the investigator has unknowingly acted without the appropriate delegations of authority to carry out the investigation or obtain certain evidence in connection with the investigation.

Limitations on powers of investigation officers to require answers and record evidence

An example of where a council strayed beyond the powers it has under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act) was considered in Zhang v Woodgate and Lane Cove Council [2015] NSWLEC 10. In this case, Lane Cove Council had issued notices under former s118BA of the EP&A Act (now s9.23) to a consultant that the defendant had engaged as part of the carrying out of unauthorised works, in an attempt to compel the consultant to provide answers in relation to the alleged breach of the EP&A Act, where criminal proceedings had already been commenced in relation to that breach. The NSW Land and Environment Court found that the notice issued to the consultant was invalid because the notice failed to identify the matter in relation to which the consultant was required to answer questions. The Court held that because the notice failed to identify these matters, it was in contravention of the requirements for such notices under s118BA of the EP&A Act.

Limitations on notices requiring persons to provide information and records

A similar issue was considered in Port Macquarie-Hastings Council v Mansfield [2019] NSWCCA 7. In this case the defendant built a large structure without development consent. When the unauthorised works were brought to the council’s attention they issued notices under former s119J (now s 9.22) of the EP&A Act for information to be provided by the defendant. After this, and once proceedings had been commenced by the council, subpoenas were issued based on those notices. The key argument raised by the defendant in these proceedings was that these notices were issued while the council was aware it was considering bringing charges against the defendant, and thus the notices were invalid as it was an improper use of the power granted under s119J of the EP&A Act. Fortunately, in this case, despite the alleged invalidity of the notices the Court decided in favour of the council, stating that the issuing of the notices was still part of the investigation of a potential EP&A Act breach, and even if it was issued for dual purposes, the EP&A Act provides the power for the notices to be issued as they were to assist the council in determining potential contraventions of the EP&A Act.

The abovementioned cases highlight the importance of ensuring strict compliance with the requirements for any notices that a council issues in relation to a prosecution. If a council fails to comply with the relevant statutory requirements in the issuing of notices, there is a reasonable risk that any evidence obtained pursuant to such notices will not be admissible in the proceedings.

Best practice interviewing techniques

In Ku-ring-gai Council v John David Chia (No 15) [2019] NSWLEC 1, the Court was asked to consider whether the investigation and interviewing techniques used by an investigator resulted in the corroboration of evidence of a witness, which would cause the witness’ evidence to be deemed unreliable and not taken into account by the Court on this basis. Ku-ing-gai Council had hired a private investigator who had allowed witnesses to be interviewed together as well as sharing with witnesses information that had been provided from other witnesses and also trying to reach witnesses through other witnesses (that may have been complicit). The judge ultimately found that the way the investigation had been conducted and the interviewing of witnesses was ‘less than ideal’, however after considering the facts of the case he ultimately determined that no corroboration had occurred, despite the opportunities for corroboration that had been provided by the investigator. In this case, a number of best practice interviewing principles for councils to adhere to were identified, including the following:

  • it is important to keep witnesses separate during the interview process;
  • witnesses should never be interviewed together because there is a chance of contamination and the witness with the stronger personality may overbear the witness with the weaker personality;
  • it is important investigators do not suggest material to witnesses as to do so may influence what they say and deprive the investigator of the ability to check what the witnesses actually know;
  • by imparting information to a witness, the witness is put on notice in relation to specific issues which may mean that a complete and independent version of what occurred cannot be obtained; and
  • where it is within his control, the investigator should not allow Witness A to come into contact with Witness B unless he/she had an independent version of facts from each of them.

In addition to the above, it is also important for investigators to remember that individuals have a right to silence and the privilege against self-incrimination (unless they have been directed or compelled under the EP&A Act or the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 to answer questions).

If during questioning an investigator forms a belief that there is sufficient evidence to establish that the person has committed an offence, then they must caution the person of their right to silence. If they do not, then any evidence obtained from that point on may be held to have been improperly obtained.

It has also been held that evidence may be improperly obtained where an employee (who is not a suspect) is making admissions against their employer and they have not been cautioned.

Has council commenced the proceedings in time?

The right to take legal action in respect of an alleged unlawful activity will often be subject to a legislative time limit. Depending on the offence, the applicable statute of limitation may restrict a council from taking action from the date of the alleged offence, or for other matters, the starting time may be from the point in time that council first became aware of the offence.

Subject to the investigating officer ensuring that he/she has the proper delegated authority required to commence a formal investigation, the investigator must ensure that all the steps that need to be undertaken in connection with the investigation take into account any statute of limitation that may apply. Without properly planning the investigation process, councils may expose themselves to a risk that by the time the investigation is complete, they may already be out of time to commence proceedings.

In May 2018 Cumberland Council experienced firsthand a challenge against proceedings it brought against an individual for the carrying out of unauthorised building works in 2014, which resulted in the development of a mosque without a construction certificate having been first obtained. In Cumberland Council v Tony Younan; Cumberland Council v Ronney Oueik; Cumberland Council v H & M Renovations Pty Ltd [2018] NSWLEC 145, Cumberland Council commenced proceedings alleging that the defendant failed to comply with a development control order, thereby committing an offence in contravention of s9.37 (formerly s125) of the EP&A Act. Due to the relevant time limit under the EP&A Act having expired, Cumberland Council sought to bring the proceedings under former s127(5A) (now s9.57(5A)) of the EP&A Act which provides that proceedings for any such offence under the EP&A Act or regulations may be commenced within, but not later than, 2 years after the date on which “evidence of the alleged offence” first came to the attention of any investigation officer who is a member of the staff of the Department. The defendant argued that the proceedings were commenced out of time.

Ultimately in this case the Court found that “evidence of the alleged offence” means that evidence capable of indicating that an offence has been committed has to have been secured. In the case of Cumberland Council’s proceedings, the Court held that the investigation officer needed to have evidence that construction works on the mosque had commenced and evidence brought to his or her attention capable of showing that a construction certificate had not been obtained when this occurred. Once evidence of both of these elements was brought to the investigating officer attention, the time limit provided by s127(5A) would have been engaged. As council was unable to demonstrate that both of these elements were satisfied, the Court determined that council had commenced the proceedings out of time.

Separately, in the case of Willoughby City Council v Screnci [2015] NSWLEC 192, Willoughby Council charged the defendant with two offences under s125 (now s9.50) of the EP&A Act for the carrying out of a large amount of development work without development consent. The key issue which arose in this case was whether the proceedings were statute-barred by reason of being commenced after the expiration of the relevant limitation period of two years fixed by s127(5) of the EP&A Act. By the time proceedings had been commenced, it had been more than two years since the builder (as a witness) had finished the work. In these circumstances, council was out of time to commence proceedings and prevented from bringing action against the defendant under s127(5). Amongst other matters, the Court was required to consider:

  • whether the onus was on council as the prosecutor in this case to establish that the proceedings were commenced in time; and
  • whether the statutory bar upon commencement of proceedings could be waived by the Court.

The Court concluded that in circumstances where the commencement of the proceedings for an offence charged is the subject of a statutory limitation period, the prosecutor bears the onus of establishing that the proceedings have been commenced within the relevant time limit. It is therefore important that council is able to provide evidence to establish that any proceedings it commences have been brought in time.

Further, once the statutory limitation provision is validly raised by a party, the Court must give effect to the statutory bar that applies. Even if a plea of guilty has been entered by the defendant in relation to the offence prior to the issue of the statutory bar issue being raised, the Court does not have discretion to maintain the defendant’s guilty plea.

Moving forward

Noting that this article provides just a few examples of some of the important matters which must be considered by a council in relation to prosecutions, should you require any assistance or have any queries, please do not hesitate to contact the Planning and Environment team at McCullough Robertson lawyers for assistance.

Special thanks to Elizabeth Ryan, Lawyer for her assistance in putting this article together.

 

This publication covers legal and technical issues in a general way. It is not designed to express opinions on specific cases. It is intended for information purposes only and should not be regarded as legal advice. Further advice should be obtained before taking action on any issue dealt with in this publication.

About the authors

The Pi-go-round feedback loop of North Burnett Regional COuncil.

In order to declare a dog regulated  you must contact the owner of the dog in writing and give them time to respond, 14 days from the receipt of the written proposal minimum.

Then there is an internal appeals process that takes TIME

Then there is an external appeals process through qcat

Then there is the AAT ( I have won twice in there so far, can we make it all for 3)

In the meantime, as you use every tool at your disposal to destroy Hunta, I will utilize every tool I have within me, starting with love and my love spreads fast.

i request an open and transparent honest independant inquiry into fisaco of corruption and all previous decisions by Sion Eager in his role as stream compliance officer for north burnett regional council.

Now that you have spent so much condescending time telling NINA and the world what you have done illegally, I shall tell you nower what I , that is we, that is manyone are going to do in response to your crime.

1, take the matter further and expose your actions publicly citing evidence of your acts, this step has already begun – here. I speak truth and I have the love of God aside me, what more powerful do you have in your court?
1, Begin a case with the CCC for corruption in your council citing evidence of your acts, this step in the process.
1, contact the CEO and mayor of your council citing the evidence of your acts, this step is in the process.
1, request, citing evidence of your acts, an unbiased independant “out of stream” investigation into all descisions made by you in your role as compliance officer of your stream and review them for compliance with laws they were made under.
1, inform the state member for Callide, Bryson Head of your acts, citing the evidence in this case
1, continue creating The Quest of the Qurad, featuring Hunta the Guntur,

 

 

Section 127

127A Concurrent regulated dog declaration and destruction
order
(1) This section applies if a local government—
(a) has made a regulated dog declaration under section 94
for the dog; but
(b) has not given the owner of the dog an information notice
under section 95 about the decision to make the
declaration.
(2) Even though the regulated dog declaration has not taken effect
under section 95(3), an authorised officer may make a
destruction order for the dog.
(3) As soon as practicable after deciding to make the destruction
order for the dog, the authorised person must serve the
destruction order on—
(a) the registered owner of the dog; or
(b) if there is no registered owner of the dog—a person who
is an owner of, or a responsible person for, the dog.
(4) The destruction order must include or be accompanied by a
single information notice about—
(a) the decision to make the regulated dog declaration under
section 94(2); and
(b) the decision to make the destruction order.
(5) Section 127AA(5) to (8) applies to the destruction order.

 

ANIMAL MANAGEMENT (CATS AND DOGS) ACT 2008 – SECT 127AA

Destruction of regulated dog or prohibited dog under destruction order

127AA Destruction of regulated dog or prohibited dog under destruction order

(1) This section applies if—

(a) the dog is a regulated dog or a prohibited dog; and

(b) section 127 does not authorise the destruction of the dog.

(2) If the dog has seriously attacked a person or an animal, the authorised person must make a destruction order in relation to the dog.

(3) If the dog has not seriously attacked a person or an animal, the authorised person may make a destruction order in relation to the dog.

(4) The destruction order must—

(a) be served on—

(i) the registered owner of the dog; or

(ii) if there is no registered owner of the dog—any person who is an owner of, or a responsible person for, the dog; and

(b) include or be accompanied by an information notice about the decision to make the destruction order.

(5) If a destruction order is made in relation to the dog, the authorised person may destroy the dog, not earlier than 14 days after the order is served under subsection (4) if an application has not been made under chapter 8 , part 1 for an internal review of the decision to make the destruction order (the
“destruction order decision” ).

(6) If an application for internal review has been made under chapter 8 , part 1 for an internal review of the destruction order decision, the authorised person may destroy the dog if—

(a) the application has been decided and both of the following apply—

(i) the decision on the application confirms the destruction order decision;

(ii) an application for an external review of the destruction order decision has not been made within the period allowed under the QCAT Act ; or

(b) the application has been withdrawn or has otherwise ended.

(7) If an application has been made for an external review of the destruction order decision, the authorised person may destroy the dog if—

(a) the application has been decided and both of the following apply—

(i) the decision on the application (the
“external review decision” ) confirms the destruction order decision;

(ii) an appeal against the external review decision has not been started within the period allowed under the QCAT Act ; or

(b) the application has been withdrawn or has otherwise ended.

(8) If an appeal against the external review decision has been started, the authorised person may destroy the dog if—

(a) the appeal has been decided and the effect of the decision is to confirm the external review decision; or

(b) the appeal has been withdrawn or has otherwise ended.

(9) In this section—

“animal” has the meaning given by section 191 .

“seriously attack” means—

(a) in relation to a person—attack the person in a way that causes the death of, or grievous bodily harm or bodily harm to, the person; or

(b) in relation to an animal—attack the animal in a way that causes the death of the animal, or maims or wounds the animal.

Simon The Eager – Hunta’s Voice

Simon Eager, Stream Compliance Officer, acting as an avatar for North Burnett Council, Failed to follow legislation and procedures and breached sections 94 and 127 of the ANIMAL MANAGEMENT (CATS AND DOGS) ACT 2008. in declaring Hunta a regulated dog as per your email of the 23rd of dec 2024 and attaching a destruction notice in the same email.

 yet your email stated as is the “block Catchnet’ voice from council is “the matter is under investigation”

“Good afternoon Nina, With respect to your dog Hunta, currently impounded and under investigation for dog attack offences, please see the attached documents.”

 

Now we can sit and talk pie all day, going around in circles in a feedback loop, or I can pick up the strong string of the stream and examine is with fine tooth mirror.

feedback loop see Pi and compare it to your distraction and diversion game of feedback loop on the above, as below.

section 129 Breach
you served a regulated dog notice and a destruction notice in the same email.

You stated in your email to NINA on the 23rd Dec 2024, i note that it is the first written correspondence she has received about this matter, that you had put material in the mail for her last week. Her mailbox is empty up to today with no mail from you.. Breach Lie 

Your regulated dog notice was dated 19th of December and yet you did not inform Nina until the 22nd of December by telephone and no written correspondance.

In order to declare a dog a regulated dog you must inform the owner in writing of your INTENTION to declare the dog a regulated dog.
After the owner (Nina) receives the Intention to declare Hunta by written notice, containg all information and evidence the council has on the case (transparency in council)she has 14 days to prepare a response and to contact legal assistance.

That is intention to issue the notice a step or two before issuing the notice.

I have listened to monologs of conversation from 3 different representatives of the council that represent this stream. These three conversations were full of word salad in the effort to bind and deceive NINA in your effort to appease an resident by making a “scapegoat” out of the most beautiful innocent loving dog put on this earyh by GOD.

In those three conversation each time Nina asked one thing of the workers and that was to provide proof that Hunta was responsible for killing a goat.

In response to her question, nina was diverted, talked over in a condescending way and told she was not listening to the workers. She was also told each and every time that the matter is under investigation and yet she received no letter and no emails until yesterday which breach legislation by combining the two letters in one. and yet every day nina has contacted council from the day her dogs went missing. each time the block wall of “it is under investigstion”

May I ask you, will you listen to someone trying to excuse themselves using “council” disguise murdering a family member?

I was listening very closely as were several other people in the rooms at the time.

These are the words recorded coming from all of your workers.

“I think” “I believe” “we suspect” “we believe” “we think” “we have reasonable suspicion” “catch net” – caught 😉

Those words are meaningless and have no place in the world today of truth.

Each instance of phone calls to NINA you displayed a disgusting superior attitude that overtly appeared like you had a lot to say about nothing.
covertly the subterfuge was subtle but visible.

I direct you back to Nina’s and now my question – will you please provide proof that hunta is responsible for a killing a goat?

I also direct you, the “stream compliance officer” to examine this “event” from true grounding of looking at a situation from all around and not just a black white authoritarian stance of ok we have a complaint –Let kill it ?

you have made a very hasty, deadly conclusion based on bias and prejudice. Hunta has no prejudice, go and meet her beautiful soul, she will love you even up to the moment the needle you are killing her with goes in. This is when justice and those who preform their duties under truths banner, blindfold themselves to truth, the very government becomes a decaying injustice.

You see I went around to visit a sister the other day, and she offered me a meal, because I was so damned hungry after running around exploring all day, I gratefully accepted and demolished that pi.

I didn’t ask where she got the pie from or if she had to kill a magpie to make it and I certainly will not walk out her door to be caught, netted, chained, caged then crucified| Nor caught in a pong catchnet of wordsalaed

what exactly are you killing, killing the problem by appeasing your rate payer at the detriment of a the heart of grandmother and all her family and friends?

That would make you guilty of murdering an innocent animal set on earth by GOD because you have that power over others.

Have you met the dog you are murdering? Have you looked in her eyes?

I will you to look into HUNTas eyes and tell that dog you are killing her because you think, you believe and you suspect that she ate a meal when she was hungry was set in front of her by her big brother.

 

Hunta’s Voice

 

 

 

 

 

 

Section 89 Power to make declaration
(1) Simon Failed to follow correct procedures by not complying with this section of the act.

92 Withdrawing proposed declaration notice
The local government may withdraw the proposed declaration
notice by giving notice of the withdrawal to any owner of the
dog the subject of the notice.

Please do, I have better things to do than be dragged back into mans ego and power war. Honestly, it is like an old rusty battery, a bunch of neutrons stirring up the elektrons and protons. Go and gaze at a sunflower and breathe.

Having said that, I hold fast! The more you try to put bandaids on and cover up your illegal acts, the more they show themselves to me, the one and the manyones.

it stops here|

The world is over it. Using confusion, word salad and illegal acts to further your own agenda and trample on people and loving animals end.

Animal Management act 2008 Qld

PDF Copy of the act ——> download here
Animal Management act 2008 Qld

Hunta’s Pertinent Legislation

60 What is a regulated dog
A regulated dog is—
(a) a declared dangerous dog; or
(b) a declared menacing dog.
61 What is a declared dangerous dog

A declared dangerous dog is—
(a) a dangerous dog declared under section 94 to be a
dangerous dog; or
(b) a dog that is the subject of a declaration, however called,
if the declaration—
(i) was made under a corresponding law; and
(ii) is the same as or similar to a dangerous dog
declaration.

62 What is a declared menacing dog
A declared menacing dog is—
(a) a menacing dog declared under section 94 to be a
menacing dog; or
(b) a dog that is the subject of a declaration, however called,
if the declaration—
(i) was made under a corresponding law; and
(ii) is the same as or similar to a menacing dog
declaration

Prohibition on supply of regulated dog or proposed
declared dog
(1) A person (the relevant person) must not supply a regulated
dog or a proposed declared dog to another person unless—
(a) the relevant person gives the other person a notice
stating that the dog is a regulated dog or a proposed
declared dog, as the case may be; or
[s 68]
Animal Management (Cats and Dogs) Act 2008
Chapter 4 Regulated dogs
Page 64 Current as at 28 August 2024
Authorised by the Parliamentary Counsel
(b) the relevant person has a reasonable excuse.
Maximum penalty—150 penalty units.
(2) In this section—
proposed declared dog means a dog the subject of—
(a) a proposed declaration notice that has not been
withdrawn; or
(b) a dangerous dog declaration or menacing dog
declaration that has been stay

Part 4 Regulated dog declarations
89 Power to make declaration
(1) Any local government may, by complying with the
requirements of this part—
(a) declare a particular dog to be a declared dangerous dog
(a dangerous dog declaration); or
(b) declare a particular dog to be a declared menacing dog
(a menacing dog declaration).
(2) A dangerous dog declaration may be made for a dog only if
the dog—
(a) has seriously attacked, or acted in a way that caused fear
to, a person or another animal; or
(b) may, in the opinion of an authorised person having
regard to the way the dog has behaved towards a person
or another animal, seriously attack, or act in a way that
causes fear to, the person or animal.
[s 90]

Animal Management (Cats and Dogs) Act 2008
Chapter 4 Regulated dogs
Page 66 Current as at 28 August 2024
Authorised by the Parliamentary Counsel
(3) A menacing dog declaration may be made for a dog only if a
ground mentioned in subsection (2) exists for the dog, except
that the attack was not serious.
(4) The declaration may be made even if the dog is not in the
local government’s area.
(5) A declaration under this section is a regulated dog
declaration.
(6) In this section—
animal has the meaning given by section 191.
seriously attack means—
(a) in relation to a person—attack the person in a way that
causes the death of, or grievous bodily harm or bodily
harm to, the person; or
(b) in relation to an animal—attack the animal in a way that
causes the death of the animal, or maims or wounds the
animal.

90 Notice of proposed declaration
(1) If a local government proposes to make a regulated dog
declaration it must give any owner of the dog a notice (a
proposed declaration notice) stating—
(a) the following details for the dog—
(i) breed;
(ii) colour;
(iii) sex;
(iv) any other noticeable distinguishing features or
marks; and
(b) the local government proposes to declare the dog to be a
regulated dog; and
(c) the type of regulated dog declaration proposed to be
made; and
(d) the reasons for the proposed declaration; and
[s 91]

Animal Management (Cats and Dogs) Act 2008
Chapter 4 Regulated dogs
Current as at 28 August 2024 Page 67
Authorised by the Parliamentary Counsel
(e) an owner of the dog may make, within a stated period,
written representations to show why the proposed
declaration should not be made.
(2) The stated period must end at least 14 days after the proposed
declaration notice is given.
(3) The proposed declaration notice may be accompanied by a
written opinion from a veterinary surgeon or other evidence
about the dog’s breed.

92 Withdrawing proposed declaration notice
The local government may withdraw the proposed declaration
notice by giving notice of the withdrawal to any owner of the
dog the subject of the notice.

94 Making regulated dog declaration
(1) The local government must consider any written
representations and evidence accompanying them within the
period stated in the proposed declaration notice.
(2) If, after complying with subsection (1), the local government
is satisfied that the relevant ground under section 89 still
exists, it must make the regulated dog declaration for the dog.
95 Giving information notice about decision to make
regulated dog declaration
(1) As soon as practicable after deciding to make a regulated dog
declaration, the local government must give any owner of the
dog the subject of the declaration an information notice about
the decision.
(2) However, the local government must not give an information
notice under subsection (1) if an authorised person has made a
destruction order under section 127A in relation to the dog.
Note—
See section 127A in relation to the requirement to give a single
information notice about the decisions to make the regulated dog
declaration and the destruction order.

5 Giving information notice about decision to make
regulated dog declaration
(1) As soon as practicable after deciding to make a regulated dog
declaration, the local government must give any owner of the
dog the subject of the declaration an information notice about
the decision.
(2) However, the local government must not give an information
notice under subsection (1) if an authorised person has made a
destruction order under section 127A in relation to the dog.
Note—
See section 127A in relation to the requirement to give a single
information notice about the decisions to make the regulated dog
declaration and the destruction order.
(3) The decision takes effect on the later of the following days—
(a) the day any owner of the dog is given the information
notice;
(b) a later day of effect stated in the information notice.
(4) The information notice must state—
(a) that the dog is the subject of—
(i) if the dog is a dangerous dog—a dangerous dog
declaration; or
(ii) if the dog is a menacing dog—a menacing dog
declaration; and
(b) the reasons for the declaration; and
(c) the local government that made the declaration; and
[s 96]
Animal Management (Cats and Dogs) Act 2008
Chapter 4 Regulated dogs
Current as at 28 August 2024 Page 69
Authorised by the Parliamentary Counsel
(d) the day the decision takes effect; and
(e) that the dog must be kept only at the place stated in the
registration notice as the address for the dog; and
(f) if the dog is impounded—a unique number given to the
dog by the local government for the purposes of
impounding; and
(g) any other information prescribed under a regulation.

 

128 Receipt for dog in particular circumstances
(1) This section applies if the dog—
(a) has, or appears to have, a registered owner; or
(b) was seized from a person who had immediate control or
custody of it.
(2) The authorised person must, as soon as practicable after the
seizure, give the registered owner or person a written receipt
for the dog—
(a) generally describing the dog and its condition; and
(b) stating the dog has been seized.
(3) If the registered owner is not present at the place at which the
dog was seized and—
(a) the place is not a public place—the receipt may be given
by leaving it at the place in a conspicuous position and
in a reasonably secure way; or
(b) the place is a public place—the receipt may be given by
leaving it at the address stated on the registration notice
for the dog.
129 Access to seized dog
(1) This section applies until the dog is returned under
section 130 or 131.
(2) The authorised person must allow the owner of the dog to
inspect it any reasonable time, from time to time.
(3) Subsection (2) does not apply if it is impracticable or would
be unreasonable to allow the inspection.
(4) The inspection must be provided free of charg!

 

 

 

 

LMNS – The light spark

LMNS

 

Lamed
Mem
Nun
Samehk

30,40,50,60

180 degrees

Lamp lights the spark
Mem Mother incubates nourishes births and raises her child
Protected by the hidden crone Baba Grandmother  “Lama”
Child is reborn as an adult with the Keys of all before which sparks the beginning of a new creation

which is a reflection

Samekh
Nun
Mem
Lamed
180 degrees

it gathers the first on way back with it so 61, 51, 41, 31 184 plus the creator and the “zeus” spark 1 +? = 365+?

Secret Mona Lisa codes Keys – visible Temple Door

truth of the GOD construct is in art .. the mirror of the eye. and behind that, is the reflection and in that is the piece of GOD that is the heart of creation. All creation

You can only see the truth trap visually in the flip ..the image appears in your brains flipped up and flipped across .. your brain reads the message backwards and upside down and THEN converts it right way up and across so this is what your brains sees..

Mona Lisa was/is the door to the red dragon’s temple (masonic) for centuries.

Every time you look at it you get drawn into the illusion.

However, if you look at the  painting from the horizon, at the reflection, you see the pure truth behind the illusionary “catchnet” light in the centre.

Is God to live in a Dog, no but the highest of us are,

you will see the cute critter under the even cuter dog if you look deep

now this is how subliminal advertising works.. grab a pic of a gambling ad or alcohol or any sleek image it will be already horver’ed horizontal and vertical flip and pasted. I have seen innocent looking pics and flipping the  the duplicate images melding them and they flip into girls or guys having sex or a bit of hawk tua, you don’t see it but your eye and mind does.. it controls you

 

note the serpent eye in the centre eye and note the temple the arch on her forehead and the temple pills are the noses. The more you see. note the two constructs in the middle at sides of image , like a winged critter with 8 legs the globe construct of perfect ion in middle, the angel bow tying it all in

 

The Hawk and The Dog
You will see these images often in Logos art and creation

as it is linked in the collective consciousness

 

Pi is Magpie SOLVED

to find pi the circumference of a circle you need to find the radius
to find the radius of a circle you need the diameter
to find the diameter of a circle you need the circumference
to find the circumference of a circle you need to find the radius .. rinse repeat
to find the radius of a circle you need the diameter
“feedback loop”

a circle is a two dimensional round line that has no beginning and no end.

and the piece of the pie has been swallowed ouroboros

Google says ouroboros is

1. : a circular symbol that depicts a snake or dragon devouring its own tail and that is used especially to represent the eternal cycle of destruction and rebirth. 2. usually ouroboros or less commonly uroboros : something (such as a never-ending cycle) that is likened to or suggestive of the Ouroboros symbol.

How to solve pi

Eat it .. AKA to solve pi take it out of the equation because any equation using pi will fail even if the equation sneakily tells you to add pi and then subtract pi you still lost that missing bit you put in in the first place..

four and twenty black birds baked in a pi
Pi literally means Magpie
Pi . Pie Magpie     My first real nickname that reflect me..

Pi in numbers using herbrew

Pi =  LAMA  Knowledge of the light manifested and dark..
3141
L 30 A 1 M 40 A 1
Pie = 72 = Which evolves
Shema /Shimmer and she is not a pie to be consumed
LMNS 30-49-50-60 I80 degrees and back again SNML 180 degrees 360
360 divided by 72 is 5 the five days of thoth the star
LAMA is pi 3.141 LAMA 3141 72: but beyond that is LMNS l SNML I ate that pie..as maggity as it was ..
it called like a magpie and that will be 180 degrees and back again with pearl and her mirror Margaret swan SNML Sanimal spells Zeus .. LMNS luminousand your book is closed . What ever else ask me .. it’s all in your nourishment .. remember .. all in the name of me drink of both botlnow to see that lie in action in your whole “societal construct” lets ask google

Pi is an abbreviation of the Greek periphereia, “periphery.” Definitions of pi. noun. the ratio of the circumference to the diameter of a circle; approximately equal to 3.14159265358979323846… transcendental number.
False

 

Meaning of the word PIE

The word “pie” comes from the Latin word pica, which means “magpie”. Before it was used to describe a pastry, “pie” was used to describe the bird. The word first appeared in English manuscripts in the 13th century.

 

magpies with their black and white contrasts and there habit of picking random items up and taking them back to their nest is one reason that magpie is associated with pie.. a pie is somehting that has random items browned baked in a pastry

The word “pie” may have come to be associated with magpies because the filling of a pie may have reminded diners of the black and white birds. For example, a mince pie is typically filled with raisins, sugar, and spices.

what is PI
a. : the symbol π denoting the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter. b. : the ratio itself : a transcendental number having a value rounded to eight decimal places of 3.14159265.8 Dec 2024

 
Succinctly, pi—which is written as the Greek letter for p, or π—is the ratio of the circumference of any circle to the diameter of that circle. Regardless of the circle’s size, this ratio will always equal pi.

Recificando

The Spanish word rectificar translates to “to rectify” or “to correct” in English. It can also mean “to change” or “to reform” in the context of conduct, “to straighten” or “to straighten out” in general, or “to add” in cooking. 

Here are some other translations for rectificar: amend, remedy, put right, and put straight.
    Adjustment of the balance
May’s word play
Rect  – Wrecked
Rect –  behind

S Samekh – The Divine Spark of Creation AKA the secret

 

 

The Revelation of Samek – The Divine Spark of Creation

 

 as revealed by the right hand of GOD Michaelangelo in his painting Adam

The only thing that reached through the firmanent was the hand of GOD “electricity” and if you observe, the gap between. They did not touch.

Michelangelo, Like Crowley, could not paint or wirte what they saw and knew, but the truth behind the lies he was tasked to paint are underneath, you just have to look from the peripherals or fold the paper

Logos

Logos = WORD

Logos is not the”word of god”

Logos became a technical term in Western philosophy
beginning with Heraclitus (c. 535 – c.  475 BC), (aka Before Christ)

Logos became part of the vernacular By Aristotle times 384 BC (aka Before Christ)
it was adopted by Shebrews in 40 bc
Christian construct started 200 ad
bible written 600ad

Logos is an ancient greek word for word.

logos is word

word is logos

your mind has been conditioned to attach GOD to the word, logos.

The More the Illusion is seen through from peripheral, from the horizon eyes will open
light goes in color comes out

of TheDark!!

Logos

Meaning

he Greek word logos (λόγος) means “word, discourse, or reason“. It’s the root of the word “logic” and is used in rhetoric to describe a method of persuasion that uses reason and logic. 

The word logos comes from the Proto-Indo-European root leǵ-, which means “I put in order, arrange, gather, choose, count, reckon, discern, say, speak”. It’s related to the Ancient Greek word légō, which means “I say”.

Chromosomes Reveal Truth

and this here shows the world the lies of the bible and man with simple science
The Creator called God actually created Woman first
WOMAN came first .. and it was a fantastic multiple orgasm indeed
in answer to the following question which can be verified by Dr Google.

Which came first, the X or the Y chromosome?

Answer

the X chromosome

 the X chromosome came first, 3 million years before a mutation lost part of the shape and y was created . The Y chromosome evolved as a shortened copy of the X chromosome; there are more genes on the X chromosome than the Y. The Y chromosome mainly determines the sex (it has a SRY region which makes the embryo a male).

The Y chromosome is important in determining a person’s biological gender. But it has much less of a say in someone’s genetic makeup, since the X chromosome has more than 1,000 genes whereas the Y chromosome has fewer than 80.

X           Y

Woman                     Man

XX                       XY

1, alphabetically X comes before Y
Aleph Bet A and B in Hebrew Aleph and her house  Bet. (Beth)

2,  Woman contains all of Man but man does not contain all of woman. thousands of genes -80 genes ..no wonder women like to buy heaps of jeans they have many to put them on.

3, Y cannot make X. It came after X, it is a further development of X and not the prime.

4, The Prime contains all of the product but the product does not contain all of the prime.

5, Woman can produce man but man cannot produce woman  XXY  XY. The two pieces do not even mirror each other. There is no jigsaw fit and connection able to be made.

6,   Man is missing the third definer to anchor and multiply.
eg; XXY  1 2 3    XY 1 2

7,  Man Y is missing Limbs from X  = Mankind construct of a WORLD with the L taken out (The Light spark of creation) MOTHER.

8, The Jewish Tribes “apparently” despised women so much there is no X in the hebrew alphabet. The Kabala or Hebrew Alphabet is a 22 digit system that encloses both letter and number associations. (K Kaph 20 is used instead of the missing Female X but that is a loose association.)

9, The three running legs of man, Y is  mutation of X with that missing leg limb

“comment” .. well !! Jesus, or did I mean ISIS.